» Articles » PMID: 24838172

Effects of Negative Content on the Processing of Gender Information: an Event-related Potential Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 May 20
PMID 24838172
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous research on emotion in language has mainly concerned the impact of emotional information on several aspects of lexico-semantic analyses of single words. However, affective influences on morphosyntactic processing are less understood. In the present study, we focused on the impact of negative valence in the processing of gender agreement relations. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants read three-word phrases and performed a syntactic judgment task. Negative and neutral adjectives could agree or disagree in gender with the preceding noun. At an electrophysiological level, the amplitude of a left anterior negativity (LAN) to gender agreement mismatches decreased in negative words, relative to neutral words. The behavioral data suggested that LAN amplitudes might be indexing the processing costs associated with the detection of gender agreement errors, since the detection of gender mismatches resulted in faster and more accurate responses than did the detection of correct gender agreement relations. According to this view, it seems that negative content facilitated the processes implicated in the early detection of gender agreement mismatches. However, gender agreement violations in negative words triggered processes involved in the reanalysis and repair of the syntactic structure, as reflected in larger P600 amplitudes to incorrect than to correct phrases, irrespective of their emotional valence.

Citing Articles

Unpleasant words can affect the detection of morphosyntactic errors: An ERP study on individual differences.

Vieitez L, Padron I, Diaz-Lago M, de Dios-Flores I, Fraga I Psychophysiology. 2024; 61(12):e14663.

PMID: 39086024 PMC: 11579219. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14663.


Emotional Attractors in Subject-Verb Number Agreement.

Hatzidaki A, Santesteban M Front Psychol. 2022; 13:880755.

PMID: 35911006 PMC: 9330507. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.880755.


The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.

Jimenez-Ortega L, Badaya E, Casado P, Fondevila S, Hernandez-Gutierrez D, Munoz F Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:651158.

PMID: 34177488 PMC: 8226263. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.651158.


Subliminal Emotional Words Impact Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Performance and Event-Related Brain Potentials.

Jimenez-Ortega L, Espuny J, de Tejada P, Vargas-Rivero C, Martin-Loeches M Front Hum Neurosci. 2017; 11:192.

PMID: 28487640 PMC: 5404140. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00192.


Testing the online reading effects of emotionality on relative clause attachment.

Garcia-Orza J, Gavilan J, Fraga I, Ferre P Cogn Process. 2017; 18(4):543-553.

PMID: 28447242 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0811-z.


References
1.
Hinojosa J, Mendez-Bertolo C, Pozo M . Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates. Psychophysiology. 2010; 47(4):748-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00982.x. View

2.
Bayer M, Sommer W, Schacht A . Reading emotional words within sentences: the impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010; 78(3):299-307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004. View

3.
Moreno E, Vazquez C . Will the glass be half full or half empty? Brain potentials and emotional expectations. Biol Psychol. 2011; 88(1):131-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.003. View

4.
Munte T, Heinze H . Brain potentials reveal deficits of language processing after closed head injury. Arch Neurol. 1994; 51(5):482-93. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540170058017. View

5.
Hinojosa J, Carretie L, Valcarcel M, Mendez-Bertolo C, Pozo M . Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009; 9(2):173-89. DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.2.173. View