Evaluation of Non-adherence in Patients Undergoing Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation: United States Transplantation Practice Patterns Survey
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Introduction: We performed a survey of United States transplantation centers to evaluate practice patterns in the assessment of nonadherence before and after kidney transplantation.
Methods: An electronically administered, anonymous survey was sent to 181 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) approved transplantation centers in 2012.
Results: Seventy-nine centers completed our survey. Of them, 51.3% had a protocol to evaluate medication/dialysis adherence before the listing; most common (36.4%) was the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire. As an alternative to a questionnaire, the most common measure of nonadherence was the number of missed hemodialysis sessions (77.0%). The most common reason for poor adherence to dialysis regimens was difficulty with transportation (81.3%). Also, 94.4% noted the lack of a questionnaire to evaluate adherence to medications but relied on drug levels (73.4%) and self report. Only 12.9% used a questionnaire for the measurement of quality of life (Karnofsky performance scale). Of the participating centers, 27.1% used a formal cognitive testing for potential living donors. A social worker was used by most centers for nonadherent patients. Respondents indicated that patients (in the pretransplantation state) were more compliant with dialysis than with medication regimens. Finally, 37.7% of respondents noted graft failure due to medication nonadherence in 15% to 29% of their patients.
Conclusions: There was a significant variability in the methods of screening for nonadherence while the patient was on dialysis, during pretransplantation work up, and during post-transplantation follow-up examinations. We recommend that there should be a standardized technique to evaluate nonadherence to facilitate focused clinical trials to improve adherence.
The evaluation of kidney transplant candidates prior to waitlisting: a scoping review.
Boerstra B, Pippias M, Kramer A, Dirix M, Daams J, Jager K Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(1):sfae377.
PMID: 40008352 PMC: 11852345. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae377.
Leino A, Kaiser T, Khalil K, Mansell H, Taber D Am J Transplant. 2024; 24(5):711-715.
PMID: 38266711 PMC: 11846656. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.01.023.
A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.
Park C, Jones M, Kaplan S, Koller F, Wilder J, Boulware L Int J Equity Health. 2022; 21(1):22.
PMID: 35151327 PMC: 8841123. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-021-01616-x.
Applying A Biopsychosocial Framework to Achieve Durable Behavior Change in Kidney Disease.
Nair D, Cukor D, Taylor W, Cavanaugh K Semin Nephrol. 2022; 41(6):487-504.
PMID: 34973694 PMC: 8751979. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2021.10.002.
Evaluation of Transplant Candidates With a History of Nonadherence: An Opinion Piece.
Sandal S, Chen T, Cantarovich M Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021; 8:2054358121990137.
PMID: 33598301 PMC: 7863559. DOI: 10.1177/2054358121990137.