» Articles » PMID: 24829212

Renal Function of Participants in the Bangkok Tenofovir Study--Thailand, 2005-2012

Abstract

Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir) has been associated with renal dysfunction in people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving combination antiretroviral therapy. We reviewed data from an HIV preexposure prophylaxis trial to determine if tenofovir use was associated with changes in renal function in an HIV-uninfected population.

Methods: During the trial, 2413 HIV-uninfected people who inject drugs were randomized to receive tenofovir or placebo. We assessed the renal function of trial participants with the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations using t tests for cross-sectional analysis and linear regression for longitudinal analysis.

Results: Creatinine clearance and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) results were lower at 24, 36, 48, and 60 months in the tenofovir group compared with the placebo group. Results declined more in the tenofovir group than in the placebo group during follow-up using the Cockcroft-Gault (P < .001) and CKD-EPI (P = .007) equations, but not MDRD (P = .12). Creatinine clearance measured when study drug was stopped was lower in the tenofovir group than the placebo group (P < .001), but the difference resolved when tested a median of 20 months later (P = .12).

Conclusions: We found small but significant decreases in cross-sectional measures of creatinine clearance and GFR in the tenofovir group compared with the placebo group and modest differences in downward trends in longitudinal analysis using the Cockcroft-Gault and CKD-EPI equations. These results suggest that with baseline assessments of renal function and routine monitoring of creatinine clearance during follow-up, tenofovir can be used safely for HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT00119106.

Citing Articles

Kidney function in tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based oral pre-exposure prophylaxis users: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature and a multi-country meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Schaefer R, da Costa Leite P, Silva R, Abdool Karim Q, Akolo C, Caceres C Lancet HIV. 2022; 9(4):e242-e253.

PMID: 35271825 PMC: 8964504. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00004-2.


Patient-Focused Selection of PrEP Medication for Individuals at Risk of HIV: A Narrative Review.

Fields S, Tung E Infect Dis Ther. 2021; 10(1):165-186.

PMID: 33569743 PMC: 7875561. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-020-00384-5.


Exposure of Leukocytes to HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Decreases Mitochondrial Function and Alters Gene Expression Profiles.

Bowman E, Cameron C, Richardson B, Kulkarni M, Gabriel J, Kettelhut A Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020; 65(1).

PMID: 33020165 PMC: 7927818. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01755-20.


Changes in kidney function among men having sex with men starting on demand tenofovir disoproxil fumarate - emtricitabine for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis.

Liegeon G, Antoni G, Pialoux G, Capitant C, Cotte L, Charreau I J Int AIDS Soc. 2020; 23(2):e25420.

PMID: 32086878 PMC: 7035456. DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25420.


Renal function change after switching tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for tenofovir alafenamide in the HIV-positive patients of a metropolitan sexual health service.

Turner D, Drak D, OConnor C, Templeton D, Gracey D AIDS Res Ther. 2019; 16(1):40.

PMID: 31810490 PMC: 6898922. DOI: 10.1186/s12981-019-0256-9.


References
1.
Gayet-Ageron A, Ananworanich J, Jupimai T, Chetchotisakd P, Prasithsirikul W, Ubolyam S . No change in calculated creatinine clearance after tenofovir initiation among Thai patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007; 59(5):1034-7. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm064. View

2.
Praditpornsilpa K, Avihingsanon A, Chaiwatanarat T, Chaiyahong P, Wongsabut J, Ubolyam S . Comparisons between validated estimated glomerular filtration rate equations and isotopic glomerular filtration rate in HIV patients. AIDS. 2012; 26(14):1781-8. PMC: 3782632. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328356480d. View

3.
Gallant J, DeJesus E, Arribas J, Pozniak A, Gazzard B, Campo R . Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(3):251-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa051871. View

4.
Rollot F, Nazal E, Chauvelot-Moachon L, Kelaidi C, Daniel N, Saba M . Tenofovir-related Fanconi syndrome with nephrogenic diabetes insipidus in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: the role of lopinavir-ritonavir-didanosine. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 37(12):e174-6. DOI: 10.1086/379829. View

5.
Young B, Buchacz K, Baker R, Moorman A, Wood K, Chmiel J . Renal function in Tenofovir-exposed and Tenofovir-unexposed patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in the HIV Outpatient Study. J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic). 2007; 6(3):178-87. DOI: 10.1177/1545109707300676. View