» Articles » PMID: 24826196

Integrating Forest Inventory and Analysis Data into a LIDAR-based Carbon Monitoring System

Overview
Date 2014 May 15
PMID 24826196
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) data may be a valuable component of a LIDAR-based carbon monitoring system, but integration of the two observation systems is not without challenges. To explore integration methods, two wall-to-wall LIDAR-derived biomass maps were compared to FIA data at both the plot and county levels in Anne Arundel and Howard Counties in Maryland. Allometric model-related errors were also considered.

Results: In areas of medium to dense biomass, the FIA data were valuable for evaluating map accuracy by comparing plot biomass to pixel values. However, at plots that were defined as "nonforest", FIA plots had limited value because tree data was not collected even though trees may be present. When the FIA data were combined with a previous inventory that included sampling of nonforest plots, 21 to 27% of the total biomass of all trees was accounted for in nonforest conditions, resulting in a more accurate benchmark for comparing to total biomass derived from the LIDAR maps. Allometric model error was relatively small, but there was as much as 31% difference in mean biomass based on local diameter-based equations compared to regional volume-based equations, suggesting that the choice of allometric model is important.

Conclusions: To be successfully integrated with LIDAR, FIA sampling would need to be enhanced to include measurements of all trees in a landscape, not just those on land defined as "forest". Improved GPS accuracy of plot locations, intensifying data collection in small areas with few FIA plots, and other enhancements are also recommended.

Citing Articles

Implications of allometric model selection for county-level biomass mapping.

Duncanson L, Huang W, Johnson K, Swatantran A, McRoberts R, Dubayah R Carbon Balance Manag. 2017; 12(1):18.

PMID: 29046991 PMC: 5647317. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-017-0086-9.


Tree biomass in the Swiss landscape: nationwide modelling for improved accounting for forest and non-forest trees.

Price B, Gomez A, Mathys L, Gardi O, Schellenberger A, Ginzler C Environ Monit Assess. 2017; 189(3):106.

PMID: 28205107 PMC: 5310548. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-017-5816-7.


Scaling wood volume estimates from inventory plots to landscapes with airborne LiDAR in temperate deciduous forest.

Levick S, Hessenmoller D, Schulze E Carbon Balance Manag. 2016; 11(1):7.

PMID: 27330548 PMC: 4887538. DOI: 10.1186/s13021-016-0048-7.


Comparative assessment of methods for estimating tree canopy cover across a rural-to-urban gradient in the mid-Atlantic region of the USA.

Riemann R, Liknes G, ONeil-Dunne J, Toney C, Lister T Environ Monit Assess. 2016; 188(5):297.

PMID: 27090528 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5281-8.


Integrating LIDAR and forest inventories to fill the trees outside forests data gap.

Johnson K, Birdsey R, Cole J, Swatantran A, ONeil-Dunne J, Dubayah R Environ Monit Assess. 2015; 187(10):623.

PMID: 26364065 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4839-1.


References
1.
Melson S, Harmon M, Fried J, Domingo J . Estimates of live-tree carbon stores in the Pacific Northwest are sensitive to model selection. Carbon Balance Manag. 2011; 6:2. PMC: 3094363. DOI: 10.1186/1750-0680-6-2. View

2.
Lister A, Scott C, Rasmussen S . Inventory methods for trees in nonforest areas in the Great Plains States. Environ Monit Assess. 2011; 184(4):2465-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-011-2131-6. View

3.
Nowak D, Greenfield E, Hoehn R, Lapoint E . Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut. 2013; 178:229-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.019. View