» Articles » PMID: 24824072

Quantitative Imaging with a Mobile Phone Microscope

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 May 15
PMID 24824072
Citations 59
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Use of optical imaging for medical and scientific applications requires accurate quantification of features such as object size, color, and brightness. High pixel density cameras available on modern mobile phones have made photography simple and convenient for consumer applications; however, the camera hardware and software that enables this simplicity can present a barrier to accurate quantification of image data. This issue is exacerbated by automated settings, proprietary image processing algorithms, rapid phone evolution, and the diversity of manufacturers. If mobile phone cameras are to live up to their potential to increase access to healthcare in low-resource settings, limitations of mobile phone-based imaging must be fully understood and addressed with procedures that minimize their effects on image quantification. Here we focus on microscopic optical imaging using a custom mobile phone microscope that is compatible with phones from multiple manufacturers. We demonstrate that quantitative microscopy with micron-scale spatial resolution can be carried out with multiple phones and that image linearity, distortion, and color can be corrected as needed. Using all versions of the iPhone and a selection of Android phones released between 2007 and 2012, we show that phones with greater than 5 MP are capable of nearly diffraction-limited resolution over a broad range of magnifications, including those relevant for single cell imaging. We find that automatic focus, exposure, and color gain standard on mobile phones can degrade image resolution and reduce accuracy of color capture if uncorrected, and we devise procedures to avoid these barriers to quantitative imaging. By accommodating the differences between mobile phone cameras and the scientific cameras, mobile phone microscopes can be reliably used to increase access to quantitative imaging for a variety of medical and scientific applications.

Citing Articles

Advances in Portable Optical Microscopy Using Cloud Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Medical Applications.

Molani A, Pennati F, Ravazzani S, Scarpellini A, Storti F, Vegetali G Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(20).

PMID: 39460161 PMC: 11510803. DOI: 10.3390/s24206682.


Portable, smartphone-linked, and miniaturized photonic resonator absorption microscope (PRAM Mini) for point-of-care diagnostics.

Khemtonglang K, Liu W, Lee H, Wang W, Li S, Li Z Biomed Opt Express. 2024; 15(10):5691-5705.

PMID: 39421766 PMC: 11482178. DOI: 10.1364/BOE.531388.


A commentary on the development and use of smartphone imaging devices.

Raju G, Ranjan A, Banik S, Poddar A, Managuli V, Mazumder N Biophys Rev. 2024; 16(2):151-163.

PMID: 38737211 PMC: 11078910. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-023-01175-1.


Photophysical image analysis: Unsupervised probabilistic thresholding for images from electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices.

Krog J, Dvirnas A, Strom O, Beech J, Tegenfeldt J, Muller V PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0300122.

PMID: 38578724 PMC: 10997106. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300122.


The Effect of Pixel Design and Operation Conditions on Linear Output Range of 4T CMOS Image Sensors.

Zhang W, Xu X, Cheng Z Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(6).

PMID: 38544103 PMC: 10975077. DOI: 10.3390/s24061841.


References
1.
Ochs M, Muhlfeld C . Quantitative microscopy of the lung: a problem-based approach. Part 1: basic principles of lung stereology. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013; 305(1):L15-22. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00429.2012. View

2.
Gallegos D, Long K, Yu H, Clark P, Lin Y, George S . Label-free biodetection using a smartphone. Lab Chip. 2013; 13(11):2124-32. DOI: 10.1039/c3lc40991k. View

3.
Sharma G, Trussell H . Digital color imaging. IEEE Trans Image Process. 1997; 6(7):901-32. DOI: 10.1109/83.597268. View

4.
Kayser K, Gortler J, Goldmann T, Vollmer E, Hufnagl P, Kayser G . Image standards in tissue-based diagnosis (diagnostic surgical pathology). Diagn Pathol. 2008; 3:17. PMC: 2362107. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-3-17. View

5.
Flint A . Determining optimal medical image compression: psychometric and image distortion analysis. BMC Med Imaging. 2012; 12:24. PMC: 3431233. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-24. View