» Articles » PMID: 24811577

Baseline Metabolic Tumour Volume is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Overview
Date 2014 May 10
PMID 24811577
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The presence of a bulky tumour at staging in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a predictor of a poor outcome. The total metabolic tumour volume at baseline (TMTV0) computed on PET may improve the evaluation of tumour burden. To explore the clinical usefulness of TMTV0, we compared the prognostic value of TMTV0, tumour bulk and interim PET response in a retrospective single-centre study.

Methods: From 2007 to 2010, 59 consecutive patients with a first diagnosis of HL were treated in our institution. PET was done at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2), and treatment was not modified according to the PET2 result. TMTV0 was measured with a semiautomatic method using a 41 % SUVmax threshold. SUVmax reduction between PET0 and PET2 (ΔSUVmaxPET0-2) was also computed. Based on ROC analysis, patients with a ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 >71 % were considered good responders and a TMTV0 >225 ml was considered to represent hypermetabolic bulky disease.

Results: Median TMTV0 was 117 ml and 17 patients (29 %) had a TMTV0 >225 ml. TMTV0 (>225 ml vs. ≤225 ml) and tumour bulk (<10 cm vs. ≥10 cm) were predictive of 4-year PFS: 42 % vs. 85 % (p = 0.001) and 44 % vs. 79 % (p < 0.03), respectively. In multivariate analysis, using ΔSUVmaxPET0-2, TMTV0 and bulky tumour as covariates, only ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 (p = 0.0005, RR 6.3) and TMTV0 (p < 0.006, RR 4.4) remained independent predictors of PFS. Three prognosis groups were thus identified: ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 >71 % and TMTV0 ≤225 ml (n = 37, 63 %), ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 = <71 % or TMTV0 >225 ml (n = 17, 29 %), and ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 = <71 % and TMTV0 >225 ml (n = 5, 8 %). In these three groups the 4-year PFS rates were 92 %, 49 %, and 20 % (p < 0.0001), respectively.

Conclusion: TMTV0 is more relevant than tumour bulk for predicting the outcome in patients with HL, and adds a significant prognostic insight to interim PET response assessment. The combination of TMTV0 and ΔSUVmaxPET0-2 made it possible to identify three subsets of HL patients with different outcomes. This may guide clinicians in their choice of therapeutic strategy.

Citing Articles

Personalized baseline and residual TMTV influence treatment response and outcomes in relapsed/refractory lymphomas: results from the GATA study.

Malmon S, Casasnovas O, Fournier M, Cartron G, Kanoun S, Cottereau A Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 39984744 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07154-w.


Postoperative stage 0 Hodgkin lymphoma. Is surgery alone a curative option?.

Couturier A, Judet A, Touati M, Nivet T, Daufresne P, Claves F Hemasphere. 2025; 9(1):e70076.

PMID: 39816530 PMC: 11733436. DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70076.


Semiquantitative 2-[F]FDG PET/CT-based parameters role in lymphoma.

Albano D, Ravanelli M, Durmo R, Versari A, Filice A, Rizzo A Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11:1515040.

PMID: 39744526 PMC: 11688351. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1515040.


Prognostic value of the combination of volume, massiveness and fragmentation parameters measured on baseline FDG pet in high-burden follicular lymphoma.

Draye-Carbonnier S, Camus V, Becker S, Tonnelet D, Leveque E, Zduniak A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):8033.

PMID: 38580734 PMC: 10997640. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58412-0.


A different perspective on PET/CT before treatment in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: importance of volumetric and dissemination parameters.

Aksu A, Kucuker K, Solmaz S, Turgut B Ann Hematol. 2023; 103(3):813-822.

PMID: 37964021 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05547-1.


References
1.
Tseng D, Rachakonda L, Su Z, Advani R, Horning S, Hoppe R . Interim-treatment quantitative PET parameters predict progression and death among patients with Hodgkin's disease. Radiat Oncol. 2012; 7:5. PMC: 3398283. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-5. View

2.
Gobbi P, Bassi E, Bergonzi M, Merli F, Coriani C, Iannitto E . Tumour burden predicts treatment resistance in patients with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ABVD and radiotherapy. Hematol Oncol. 2012; 30(4):194-9. DOI: 10.1002/hon.1024. View

3.
Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, Petegnief Y, Luciani A, Dupuis J . Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med. 2007; 48(10):1626-32. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.107.042093. View

4.
Connors J . Positron emission tomography in the management of Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011; 2011:317-22. DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.317. View

5.
Hasenclever D, Diehl V . A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin's disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin's Disease. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339(21):1506-14. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199811193392104. View