» Articles » PMID: 24810111

Mandible Reconstruction Using Patient-specific Pre-bent Reconstruction Plates: Comparison of Standard and Transfer Key Methods

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 May 10
PMID 24810111
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Mandible reconstruction with reconstruction plates requires bending the plates during the operation and fixation using the "standard method" (ST-method). The ST-method is limited when a pathological process has perforated the mandibular outer cortex. A transfer key method (TK-method) was developed where plates are pre-bent using a patient-specific mandible model and positioned on the mandible with the help of transfer keys. The ST-method and TK-method were compared in a clinical trial.

Methods: Mandibular reconstruction was performed on 42 patients in this study: 22 were performed using the TK-method and 20 using the ST-method. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were evaluated by measuring the distances between six corresponding landmarks on the mandibular condyles and rami. The difference between pre- and postoperative distances was used to evaluate reconstruction accuracy.

Results: The median deviation of the unsigned/ absolute values of all six distances was 1.07 mm for the TK-method and 1.67 mm for the ST-method. The TK-method showed significantly better results. For the signed values, the median deviation of the six distances was -0.6 mm for the TK-method and -1.47 mm for the ST-method, indicating that the mandibles became narrower with both methods. This width difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The TK-method was more accurate than the ST-method in a clinical trial. The TK-method was effective and accurate for mandible reconstruction using pre-bent fixation plates.

Citing Articles

Bone reconstruction using CAD/CAM technology in head and neck surgical oncology. A narrative review of state of the art and aesthetic-functional outcomes.

Copelli C, Cacciatore F, Cocis S, Maglitto F, Barbara F, Iocca O Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024; 44(Suppl. 1):S58-S66.

PMID: 38745517 PMC: 11098535. DOI: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-44-2024-N2819.


In-House 3D Printed Positioning and Cutting Guide System for Mandibular Reconstruction. Protocol and case report.

Rodriguez-Arias J, Moreiras-Sanchez A, Gutierrez-Venturini A, Pampin M, Gonzalez J, Moran M J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(2):e229-e235.

PMID: 38496808 PMC: 10943673. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61278.


Finite element analysis and clinical application of 3D-printed Ti alloy implant for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Xue R, Lai Q, Xing H, Zhong C, Zhao Y, Zhu K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):95.

PMID: 38233785 PMC: 10792868. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-03857-y.


Cutting-edge patient-specific surgical plates for computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: The art of matching structures and holes in precise surgery.

Liu R, Su Y, Pu J, Zhang C, Yang W Front Surg. 2023; 10:1132669.

PMID: 36969756 PMC: 10033664. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1132669.


Osseous Union after Jaw Reconstruction with Fibula-Free Flap: Conventional vs. CAD/CAM Patient-Specific Implants.

Knitschke M, Yonan M, Roller F, Pons-Kuhnemann J, Attia S, Howaldt H Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497255 PMC: 9738514. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235774.


References
1.
Schrag C, Chang Y, Tsai C, Wei F . Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection. J Surg Oncol. 2006; 94(6):538-45. DOI: 10.1002/jso.20491. View

2.
Marx R, Ehler W, Peleg M . "Mandibular and facial reconstruction" rehabilitation of the head and neck cancer patient. Bone. 1996; 19(1 Suppl):59S-82S. DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00137-8. View

3.
Salgueiro M, Stevens M . Experience with the use of prebent plates for the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2011; 3(4):201-8. PMC: 3052711. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268520. View

4.
Hallermann W, Olsen S, Bardyn T, Taghizadeh F, Banic A, Iizuka T . A new method for computer-aided operation planning for extensive mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117(7):2431-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000219076.83890.e8. View

5.
Baker A, McMahon J, Parmar S . Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59(11):1333-9. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.27825. View