» Articles » PMID: 24808862

Increased Reaction Times and Reduced Response Preparation Already Starts at Middle Age

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2014 May 9
PMID 24808862
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Generalized slowing characterizes aging and there is some evidence to suggest that this slowing already starts at midlife. This study aims to assess reaction time changes while performing a concurrent low-force and high-force motor task in young and middle-aged subjects. The high-force motor task is designed to induce muscle fatigue and thereby progressively increase the attentional demands. Twenty-five young (20-30 years, 12 males) and 16 middle-aged (35-55 years, 9 males) adults performed an auditory two-choice reaction time task (CRT) with and without a concurrent low- or high-force motor task. The CRT required subjects to respond to two different stimuli that occurred with a probability of 70 or 30%. The motor task consisted of index finger abduction, at either 10% (10%-dual-task) or 30% (30%-dual-task) of maximal voluntary force. Cognitive task performance was measured as percentage of correct responses and reaction times. Middle-aged subjects responded slower on the frequent but more accurately on the infrequent stimuli of CRT than young subjects. Both young and middle-aged subjects showed increased errors and reaction times while performing under dual-task conditions and both outcome measures increased further under fatiguing conditions. Only under 30%-dual-task demands, an age-effect on dual-task performance was present. Both single- and dual-task conditions showed that already at mid-life response preparation is seriously declined and that subjects implement different strategies to perform a CRT task.

Citing Articles

Coffee consumption and alertness: a study among office workers in Jakarta.

Herqutanto , Rosemiarti T, Dewi D, Soemarko D, Syam A Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1425707.

PMID: 39582667 PMC: 11583965. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1425707.


Impact of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Cerebellum on Performance of a Ballistic Targeting Movement.

Matsugi A, Nishishita S, Yoshida N, Tanaka H, Douchi S, Bando K Cerebellum. 2022; 22(4):680-697.

PMID: 35781778 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01438-9.


Cerebral Cortical Activity During Academic Stress Amongst Undergraduate Medical Students at Kampala International University (Uganda).

Mujinya R, Kalange M, Ochieng J, Ninsiima H, Eze E, Afodun A Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:551508.

PMID: 35757206 PMC: 9231459. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.551508.


TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults.

Kaminski E, Engelhardt M, Hoff M, Steele C, Villringer A, Ragert P Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3421.

PMID: 33564052 PMC: 7873227. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82275-4.


Self-Reported Fatigue After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Is Not Associated With Performance Fatigability During a Sustained Maximal Contraction.

Prak R, van der Naalt J, Zijdewind I Front Physiol. 2019; 9:1919.

PMID: 30687127 PMC: 6335345. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01919.


References
1.
Mattay V, Fera F, Tessitore A, Hariri A, Das S, Callicott J . Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function. Neurology. 2002; 58(4):630-5. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.58.4.630. View

2.
HARTLEY A . Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. Psychol Aging. 2001; 16(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.47. View

3.
Fraser S, Li K, DeMont R, Penhune V . Effects of balance status and age on muscle activation while walking under divided attention. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007; 62(3):P171-8. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/62.3.p171. View

4.
Cuypers K, Thijs H, Duque J, Swinnen S, Levin O, Meesen R . Age-related differences in corticospinal excitability during a choice reaction time task. Age (Dordr). 2012; 35(5):1705-19. PMC: 3776102. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-012-9471-1. View

5.
Crossley M, Hiscock M . Age-related differences in concurrent-task performance of normal adults: evidence for a decline in processing resources. Psychol Aging. 1992; 7(4):499-506. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.7.4.499. View