» Articles » PMID: 24795619

High-throughput Neuroimaging-genetics Computational Infrastructure

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 May 6
PMID 24795619
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many contemporary neuroscientific investigations face significant challenges in terms of data management, computational processing, data mining, and results interpretation. These four pillars define the core infrastructure necessary to plan, organize, orchestrate, validate, and disseminate novel scientific methods, computational resources, and translational healthcare findings. Data management includes protocols for data acquisition, archival, query, transfer, retrieval, and aggregation. Computational processing involves the necessary software, hardware, and networking infrastructure required to handle large amounts of heterogeneous neuroimaging, genetics, clinical, and phenotypic data and meta-data. Data mining refers to the process of automatically extracting data features, characteristics and associations, which are not readily visible by human exploration of the raw dataset. Result interpretation includes scientific visualization, community validation of findings and reproducible findings. In this manuscript we describe the novel high-throughput neuroimaging-genetics computational infrastructure available at the Institute for Neuroimaging and Informatics (INI) and the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging (LONI) at University of Southern California (USC). INI and LONI include ultra-high-field and standard-field MRI brain scanners along with an imaging-genetics database for storing the complete provenance of the raw and derived data and meta-data. In addition, the institute provides a large number of software tools for image and shape analysis, mathematical modeling, genomic sequence processing, and scientific visualization. A unique feature of this architecture is the Pipeline environment, which integrates the data management, processing, transfer, and visualization. Through its client-server architecture, the Pipeline environment provides a graphical user interface for designing, executing, monitoring validating, and disseminating of complex protocols that utilize diverse suites of software tools and web-services. These pipeline workflows are represented as portable XML objects which transfer the execution instructions and user specifications from the client user machine to remote pipeline servers for distributed computing. Using Alzheimer's and Parkinson's data, we provide several examples of translational applications using this infrastructure.

Citing Articles

Data management strategy for a collaborative research center.

Mittal D, Mease R, Kuner T, Flor H, Kuner R, Andoh J Gigascience. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37401720 PMC: 10318494. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giad049.


Classifying migraine using PET compressive big data analytics of brain's -opioid and D2/D3 dopamine neurotransmission.

Marino S, Jassar H, Kim D, Lim M, Nascimento T, Dinov I Front Pharmacol. 2023; 14:1173596.

PMID: 37383727 PMC: 10294712. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1173596.


Functional magnetic resonance imaging of headache: Issues, best-practices, and new directions, a narrative review.

Hranilovich J, Legget K, Dodd K, Wylie K, Tregellas J Headache. 2023; 63(3):309-321.

PMID: 36942411 PMC: 10089616. DOI: 10.1111/head.14487.


Bridging the Brain and Data Sciences.

Van Horn J Big Data. 2020; 9(3):153-187.

PMID: 33211552 PMC: 8233216. DOI: 10.1089/big.2020.0065.


Compressive Big Data Analytics: An ensemble meta-algorithm for high-dimensional multisource datasets.

Marino S, Zhao Y, Zhou N, Zhou Y, Toga A, Zhao L PLoS One. 2020; 15(8):e0228520.

PMID: 32857775 PMC: 7455041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228520.


References
1.
von Eschenbach A, Buetow K . Cancer informatics vision: caBIG. Cancer Inform. 2009; 2:22-4. PMC: 2675495. View

2.
Dinov I, Van Horn J, Lozev K, Magsipoc R, Petrosyan P, Liu Z . Efficient, Distributed and Interactive Neuroimaging Data Analysis Using the LONI Pipeline. Front Neuroinform. 2009; 3:22. PMC: 2718780. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.11.022.2009. View

3.
Sloutsky R, Jimenez N, Swamidass S, Naegle K . Accounting for noise when clustering biological data. Brief Bioinform. 2012; 14(4):423-36. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbs057. View

4.
Dinov I, Rubin D, Lorensen W, Dugan J, Ma J, Murphy S . iTools: a framework for classification, categorization and integration of computational biology resources. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2265. PMC: 2386255. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002265. View

5.
Ho A, Raji C, Becker J, Lopez O, Kuller L, Hua X . Obesity is linked with lower brain volume in 700 AD and MCI patients. Neurobiol Aging. 2010; 31(8):1326-39. PMC: 3197833. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.04.006. View