Comparison of Self-report-based and Physical Performance-based Frailty Definitions Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility.
Study Design: In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the classic performance-based definition and developed a modified self-report-based definition.
Setting & Participants: Prevalent adult patients receiving hemodialysis in 14 centers around San Francisco and Atlanta in 2009-2011.
Index Tests: Self-report-based frailty definition in which a score lower than 75 on the Physical Function scale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was substituted for gait speed and grip strength in the classic definition; modified self-report definition with optimized Physical Function score cutoff points derived in a development (one-half) cohort and validated in the other half.
Reference Test: Performance-based frailty defined as 3 of the following: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow gait speed.
Results: 387 (53%) patients were frail based on self-reported function, of whom 209 (29% of the cohort) met the performance-based definition. Only 23 (3%) met the performance-based definition of frailty only. The self-report definition had 90% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 72.5% overall accuracy. Intracellular water per kilogram of body weight and serum albumin, prealbumin, and creatinine levels were highest among nonfrail individuals, intermediate among those who were frail by self-report, and lowest among those who also were frail by performance. Age, percentage of body fat, and C-reactive protein level followed an opposite pattern. The modified self-report definition had better accuracy (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%) and superior specificity (88%) and positive predictive value (67%).
Limitations: Our study did not address prediction of outcomes.
Conclusions: Patients who meet the self-report-based but not the performance-based definition of frailty may represent an intermediate phenotype. A modified self-report definition can improve the accuracy of a questionnaire-based method of defining frailty.
Frailty Assessment Tools in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Puri A, Lloyd A, Bello A, Tonelli M, Campbell S, Tennankore K Kidney Med. 2025; 7(3):100960.
PMID: 39980935 PMC: 11841092. DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100960.
Hsieh M, Luo C, Cheng C, Dai L, Chen C, Chuang S Aging (Albany NY). 2024; 16(22):13676-13692.
PMID: 39733527 PMC: 11723663. DOI: 10.18632/aging.206178.
Wang L, Chen H, Zhu H, Hu Z, Zhou C, Hu X Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1444119.
PMID: 39525460 PMC: 11543459. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1444119.
FRAIL scale as a screening tool and a predictor of mortality in non-dialysis dependent patients.
Rodrigues H, Sousa A, Preto V, Ferro C, Sugizaki C, Freitas A J Nephrol. 2024; 37(4):1085-1092.
PMID: 38530601 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01900-3.
Use of frailty assessment instruments in nephrology populations: a scoping review.
Kennard A, Rainsford S, Glasgow N, Talaulikar G BMC Geriatr. 2023; 23(1):449.
PMID: 37479978 PMC: 10360289. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04101-y.