» Articles » PMID: 24791062

A Comparison of the Histological Structure of the Placenta in Experimental Animals

Overview
Date 2014 May 3
PMID 24791062
Citations 117
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The primary function of the placenta is to act as an interface between the dam and fetus. The anatomic structure of the chorioallantoic placenta in eutherian mammals varies between different animal species. The placental types in eutherian mammals are classified from various standpoints based on the gross shape, the histological structure of the materno-fetal interface, the type of materno-fetal interdigitation, etc. Particularly, the histological structure is generally considered one of the most useful and instructive classifications for functionally describing placental type. In this system, three main types are recognized according to the cell layers comprising the interhemal area: (1) epitheliochorial type (horses, pigs and ruminants), (2) endotheliochorial type (carnivores) and (3) hemochorial type (primates, rodents and rabbits). The number of cell layers in the interhemal area is considered to modify the transfer of nutrients between maternal and fetal blood and is one of the important factors with respect to the difference in placental permeability between animal species. Therefore, in reproductive and developmental toxicity studies, careful attention should be paid to the histological structure of the interhemal area when extrapolating information concerning placental transfer characteristics to different animal species.

Citing Articles

Animal Models for Studying Developmental Origins of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome.

Tain Y, Lin Y, Hsu C Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002865 PMC: 11853432. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020452.


Morphology and Immunoexpression of Selenoproteins in Term Placenta of Alpaca () from the Peruvian Andes.

Navarrete Zamora M, Acuna F, Duarte da Silva M, Santos-Silva T, Garcia M, Barreto R Biology (Basel). 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39857295 PMC: 11762802. DOI: 10.3390/biology14010064.


Predisposing Factors for Pseudoplacentational Endometrial Hyperplasia or Cystic Endometrial Hyperplasia in Dogs and Their Association with Pyometra.

Santana C, Souza M, da Silva L, de Souza L, Santana A, Oliveira A Vet Sci. 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39852876 PMC: 11768680. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12010001.


Deciphering the colostral-immunity transfer: from mammary gland to neonates small intestine.

Abdelrahman M, Liu G, Al-Saeed F, Liu Y, Hou F, Yang H Vet Res Commun. 2025; 49(2):72.

PMID: 39798032 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-025-10646-7.


Nonhuman primate models of pediatric viral diseases.

Vijayan K K V, De Paris K Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1493885.

PMID: 39691699 PMC: 11649651. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1493885.


References
1.
Enders , Blankenship . Comparative placental structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2000; 38(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(99)00003-4. View

2.
Cline J, Dixon D, Ernerudh J, Faas M, Gohner C, Hager J . The placenta in toxicology. Part III: Pathologic assessment of the placenta. Toxicol Pathol. 2013; 42(2):339-44. DOI: 10.1177/0192623313482207. View

3.
Enders A, Carter A . What can comparative studies of placental structure tell us?--A review. Placenta. 2004; 25 Suppl A:S3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.01.011. View

4.
Bode G, Clausing P, Gervais F, Loegsted J, Luft J, Nogues V . The utility of the minipig as an animal model in regulatory toxicology. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2010; 62(3):196-220. DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.05.009. View

5.
Carter A . Animal models of human placentation--a review. Placenta. 2007; 28 Suppl A:S41-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2006.11.002. View