» Articles » PMID: 24790271

The Complex Sleep Apnea Resolution Study: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Adaptive Servoventilation Therapy

Overview
Journal Sleep
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2014 May 3
PMID 24790271
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Prior studies show that adaptive servoventilation (ASV) is initially more effective than continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for patients with complex sleep apnea syndrome (CompSAS), but choosing therapies has been controversial because residual central breathing events may resolve over time in many patients receiving chronic CPAP therapy. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, prospective trial comparing clinical and polysomnographic outcomes over prolonged treatment of patients with CompSAS, with CPAP versus ASV.

Methods: Qualifying participants meeting criteria for CompSAS were randomized to optimized CPAP or ASV treatment. Clinical and polysomnographic data were obtained at baseline and after 90 days of therapy.

Results: We randomized 66 participants (33 to each treatment). At baseline, the diagnostic apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 37.7 ± 27.8 (central apnea index [CAI] = 3.2 ± 5.8) and best CPAP AHI was 37.0 ± 24.9 (CAI 29.7 ± 25.0). After second-night treatment titration, the AHI was 4.7 ± 8.1 (CAI = 1.1 ± 3.7) on ASV and 14.1 ± 20.7 (CAI = 8.8 ± 16.3) on CPAP (P ≤ 0.0003). At 90 days, the ASV versus CPAP AHI was 4.4 ± 9.6 versus 9.9 ± 11.1 (P = 0.0024) and CAI was 0.7 ± 3.4 versus 4.8 ± 6.4 (P < 0.0001), respectively. In the intention-to-treat analysis, success (AHI < 10) at 90 days of therapy was achieved in 89.7% versus 64.5% of participants treated with ASV and CPAP, respectively (P = 0.0214). Compliance and changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index were not significantly different between treatment groups.

Conclusion: Adaptive servoventilation (ASV) was more reliably effective than CPAP in relieving complex sleep apnea syndrome. While two thirds of participants experienced success with CPAP, approximately 90% experienced success with ASV. Because both methods produced similar symptomatic changes, it is unclear if this polysomnographic effectiveness may translate into other desired outcomes.

Clinical Trials: Clinicaltrials.Gov NCT00915499.

Citing Articles

Sleep and Breathing Conference highlights 2023: a summary by ERS Assembly 4.

Bradicich M, Siciliano M, Donfrancesco F, Cherneva R, Ferraz B, Testelmans D Breathe (Sheff). 2023; 19(3):230168.

PMID: 38020339 PMC: 10644110. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0168-2023.


Successful treatment of auto-trilevel positive airway pressure plus trazodone for obstructive sleep apnea complicated by anxiety disorder: a case report.

He X, Lang Q, Pei Z, Yan H J Int Med Res. 2023; 51(8):3000605231193924.

PMID: 37632420 PMC: 10926403. DOI: 10.1177/03000605231193924.


Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults.

Pinto A, Rocha A, Pachito D, Drager L, Lorenzi-Filho G Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 10:CD012889.

PMID: 36278514 PMC: 9590003. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012889.pub2.


International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Chang J, Goldberg A, Alt J, Mohammed A, Ashbrook L, Auckley D Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022; 13(7):1061-1482.

PMID: 36068685 PMC: 10359192. DOI: 10.1002/alr.23079.


The Pathogenesis of Central and Complex Sleep Apnea.

Roberts E, Raphelson J, Orr J, LaBuzetta J, Malhotra A Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022; 22(7):405-412.

PMID: 35588042 PMC: 9239939. DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01199-2.


References
1.
Malhotra A, Bertisch S, Wellman A . Complex sleep apnea: it isn't really a disease. J Clin Sleep Med. 2008; 4(5):406-8. PMC: 2576324. View

2.
Salloum A, Rowley J, Mateika J, Chowdhuri S, Omran Q, Badr M . Increased propensity for central apnea in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009; 181(2):189-93. PMC: 2809244. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200810-1658OC. View

3.
Morgenthaler T, Gay P, Gordon N, Brown L . Adaptive servoventilation versus noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for central, mixed, and complex sleep apnea syndromes. Sleep. 2007; 30(4):468-75. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/30.4.468. View

4.
Bitter T, Westerheide N, Hossain M, Lehmann R, Prinz C, Kleemeyer A . Complex sleep apnoea in congestive heart failure. Thorax. 2011; 66(5):402-7. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.146522. View

5.
Randerath W, Galetke W, Kenter M, Richter K, Schafer T . Combined adaptive servo-ventilation and automatic positive airway pressure (anticyclic modulated ventilation) in co-existing obstructive and central sleep apnea syndrome and periodic breathing. Sleep Med. 2009; 10(8):898-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2008.09.017. View