» Articles » PMID: 24785604

Using a Checklist to Assess Pregnancy in Teenagers and Young Women

Overview
Journal Obstet Gynecol
Date 2014 May 3
PMID 24785604
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Health care providers should assess pregnancy in women seeking contraceptive services. Although urine pregnancy tests are available in most U.S. settings, their accuracy varies based on timing relative to missed menses, recent intercourse, or recent pregnancy. We examined the performance of a checklist based on criteria recommended in family planning guidance documents to assist health care providers in assessing pregnancy in a sample of U.S. teenagers and young women.

Methods: Study participants were a convenience sample of sexually active black females aged 14-19 years seeking care in an urban family planning clinic. Each participant provided a urine sample for pregnancy testing and was then administered the checklist in two formats, audio computer-assisted self-interview and in-person interview. We estimated measures of the checklist performance compared with urine pregnancy test as the reference standard, including negative predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.

Results: Of 350 participants, 31 (8.9%) had a positive urine pregnancy test. The audio computer-assisted self-interview checklist indicated pregnancy was unlikely for 250 participants, of whom 241 had a negative urine pregnancy test (negative predictive value=96.4%). The sensitivity of the audio computer-assisted self-interview checklist was 71%, the specificity was 75.6%, and the positive predictive value was 22%. The in-person checklist yielded similar results.

Conclusion: The checklist may be a valuable tool to assist in assessing pregnancy in teenagers and young women. Appropriate use of the checklist by family planning providers in combination with discussion and clinically indicated use of urine pregnancy tests may reduce unnecessary barriers to contraception in this population.

Citing Articles

Comorbid anxiety and depression: Prevalence and associated factors among pregnant women in Arba Minch zuria district, Gamo zone, southern Ethiopia.

Bante A, Mersha A, Zerdo Z, Wassihun B, Yeheyis T PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248331.

PMID: 33690693 PMC: 7946223. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248331.


Association between maternal age and adverse perinatal outcomes in Arba Minch zuria, and Gacho Baba district, southern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study.

Mersha A, Ayele G, Worku T, Zerdo Z, Shibiru S, Bante A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20(1):590.

PMID: 33023526 PMC: 7541292. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-020-03285-0.


The Teen Access and Quality Initiative: Improving Adolescent Reproductive Health Best Practices in Publicly Funded Health Centers.

Brittain A, Tevendale H, Mueller T, Kulkarni A, Middleton D, Garrison M J Community Health. 2019; 45(3):615-625.

PMID: 31820301 PMC: 11008673. DOI: 10.1007/s10900-019-00781-z.


Removing barriers to contraception through use of criteria to assess pregnancy risk.

Tepper N, Curtis K, Jatlaoui T, Whiteman M Contraception. 2017; 95(4):323-325.

PMID: 28214517 PMC: 11000531. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.02.002.

References
1.
Gray R, Pardthaisong T . In utero exposure to steroid contraceptives and survival during infancy. Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134(8):804-11. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116153. View

2.
Tepper N, Marchbanks P, Curtis K . Use of a checklist to rule out pregnancy: a systematic review. Contraception. 2012; 87(5):661-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.007. View

3.
Stanback J, Qureshi Z, Sekadde-Kigondu C, Gonzalez B, Nutley T . Checklist for ruling out pregnancy among family-planning clients in primary care. Lancet. 1999; 354(9178):566. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01578-0. View

4.
Bracken M . Oral contraception and congenital malformations in offspring: a review and meta-analysis of the prospective studies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76(3 Pt 2):552-7. View

5.
Leisenring W, Alonzo T, Pepe M . Comparisons of predictive values of binary medical diagnostic tests for paired designs. Biometrics. 2000; 56(2):345-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00345.x. View