» Articles » PMID: 24777647

Comparative Effectiveness of Liver Transplant Strategies for End-stage Liver Disease Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy

Overview
Journal Liver Transpl
Date 2014 Apr 30
PMID 24777647
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There are complex risk-benefit tradeoffs with different transplantation strategies for end-stage liver disease patients on renal support. Using a Markov discrete-time state transition model, we compared survival for this group with 3 strategies: simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation, liver transplantation alone (LTA) followed by immediate kidney transplantation if renal function did not recover, and LTA followed by placement on the kidney transplant wait list. Patients were followed for 30 years from the age of 50 years. The probabilities of events were synthesized from population data and clinical trials according to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (21-30 and >30) to estimate input parameters. Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of uncertainty on survival. Overall, the highest survival rates were seen with SLK transplantation for both MELD score groups (82.8% for MELD scores of 21-30 and 82.5% for MELD scores > 30 at 1 year), albeit at the cost of using kidneys that might not be needed. Liver transplantation followed by kidney transplantation led to higher survival rates (77.3% and 76.4%, respectively, at 1 year) than placement on the kidney transplant wait list (75.1% and 74.3%, respectively, at 1 year). When uncertainty was considered, the results indicated that the waiting time and renal recovery affected conclusions about survival after SLK transplantation and liver transplantation, respectively. The subgroups with the longest durations of pretransplant renal replacement therapy and highest MELD scores had the largest absolute increases in survival with SLK transplantation versus sequential transplantation. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate the inherent tension in choices about the use of available kidneys and suggest that performing liver transplantation and using renal transplantation only for those who fail to recover their native renal function could free up available donor kidneys. These results could inform discussions about transplantation policy.

Citing Articles

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy: Considerations for Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation Versus Safety Net.

Pita A, Kaur N, Emamaullee J, Lo M, Nguyen B, Sabour A Transplant Direct. 2019; 5(10):e490.

PMID: 31723585 PMC: 6791601. DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000935.


Early detection of acute kidney injury in the perioperative period of liver transplant with neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Lima C, Haddad L, de Melo P, Malbouisson L, do Carmo L, Carneiro DAlbuquerque L BMC Nephrol. 2019; 20(1):367.

PMID: 31615452 PMC: 6794911. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1566-9.


Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience.

Korayem I, Agopian V, Lunsford K, Gritsch H, Veale J, Lipshutz G Clin Transplant. 2019; 33(6):e13569.

PMID: 31006141 PMC: 6653637. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13569.


Comparing Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant Strategies: A Modified Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Cheng X, Kim W, Tan J, Chertow G, Goldhaber-Fiebert J Transplantation. 2018; 102(5):e219-e228.

PMID: 29554056 PMC: 7946326. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002148.


Differential Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplant Benefit Based on Severity of Liver Damage at the Time of Transplantation.

Habib S, Khan K, Hsu C, Meister E, Rana A, Boyer T Gastroenterology Res. 2017; 10(2):106-115.

PMID: 28496531 PMC: 5412543. DOI: 10.14740/gr803w.


References
1.
Llovet J, Fuster J, Bruix J . Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999; 30(6):1434-40. DOI: 10.1002/hep.510300629. View

2.
Eason J, Gonwa T, Davis C, Sung R, Gerber D, Bloom R . Proceedings of Consensus Conference on Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation (SLK). Am J Transplant. 2008; 8(11):2243-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02416.x. View

3.
Myers R, Shaheen A, Aspinall A, Quinn R, Burak K . Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate. J Hepatol. 2010; 54(3):462-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.07.015. View

4.
Sonnenberg F, Beck J . Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 1993; 13(4):322-38. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9301300409. View

5.
Nair S, Verma S, Thuluvath P . Pretransplant renal function predicts survival in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2002; 35(5):1179-85. DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33160. View