» Articles » PMID: 24772132

Effect of a Workshop in Rational Pharmacotherapy for Interns During Family Medicine Clerkship in Samsun- Turkey

Overview
Journal Pak J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Apr 29
PMID 24772132
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of rational pharmacotherapy workshop for interns on the rationality, cost and number of drugs prescribed.

Methods: The participants were asked to prescribe a medication for acute noninflammatory osteoarthritis (ANOA), acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ARS), acute otitis media (AOM), acute uncomplicated cystitis (AC), and acute bacterial tonsillopharyngitis (ABT) before and after workshop. Total 3000 prescriptions were scored regarding rationality of the drug choice (0-10), format (0-5), instructions (0-4), legibility (0-1) and total (0-20 points). The mean number of drug(s) and total costs per prescription were calculated. Paired samples t-test was used to compare the pre- and post score means.

Results: Total pre- and post-prescribing scores (0-20) were significantly different (p=0.00 for each): ANOA (13.59±0.27, 18.33±0.18), ARS (13.26 ±0.18, 15.15 ±0.17), AOM (12.58 ± 0.26, 14.66±0.27), AC (13.53±0.17, 15.76±0.20), ABT (13.54±0.24, 15.49 ±0.28). Mean number of drugs per prescription for the indications in the pre-test and post-test were: ANOA (1.24 ±0.29, 1.02±0.01, p=0.00), ARS (2.08±0.04, 2.00±0.04, p=0.16), AOM (1.66±0.04 and 1.69±0.03, p=0.54), AC (1.55±0.04, 1.39±0.03, p=0.00) and ABT (2.10±0.05, 1.81±0.05, p=0.00). Mean costs per prescription in Turkish Liras: ANOA (6.31±0.29, 4.60±0.05, p=0.00), ARS (13.80±0.38, 4.63±0.04, p=0.00), AOM (10.18±0.28, 4.41±0.07, p=0.00), AC (11.33±0.21, 10.68±0.18, p=0.01) and ABT (12.03±0.34 and 10.41±0.35, p=0.00).

Conclusion: Training produced a significant improvement in rational prescribing.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a short-structured learner-centric training program on rational drug prescribing for medical interns: A quasi-experimental study.

Nishanthi A, Mahendran R, Ganapathy K, Shanthi M J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(8):3231-3237.

PMID: 39228589 PMC: 11368342. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_129_24.

References
1.
Irshaid Y, Al-Homrany M, Hamdi A, Adjepon-Yamoah K, Mahfouz A . A pharmacoepidemiological study of prescription pattern in outpatient clinics in Southwestern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2005; 25(12):1864-70. View

2.
Patricio K, Alves N, Arenales N, Queluz T . Teaching the Rational Use of Medicines to medical students: a qualitative research. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12:56. PMC: 3548729. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-56. View

3.
Ravi Shankar P, Jha N, Bajracharya O, Gurung S, Singh K . Feedback on and knowledge, attitude, and skills at the end of pharmacology practical sessions. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2012; 8:12. PMC: 3250588. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2011.8.12. View

4.
Stewart M, Purdy J, Kennedy N, Burns A . An interprofessional approach to improving paediatric medication safety. BMC Med Educ. 2010; 10:19. PMC: 2834694. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-19. View

5.
Bantar C, Sartori B, Vesco E, Heft C, Saul M, Salamone F . A hospitalwide intervention program to optimize the quality of antibiotic use: impact on prescribing practice, antibiotic consumption, cost savings, and bacterial resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 37(2):180-6. DOI: 10.1086/375818. View