» Articles » PMID: 24767095

Risk and Consequences of Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenic Complications in Patients Receiving Daily Filgrastim: the Importance of Duration of Prophylaxis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Apr 29
PMID 24767095
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To examine duration of daily filgrastim prophylaxis, and risk and consequences of chemotherapy-induced neutropenic complications (CINC) requiring inpatient care.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort design and US healthcare claims data (2001-2010), we identified all cancer patients who initiated ≥1 course of myelosuppressive chemotherapy and received daily filgrastim prophylactically in ≥1 cycle. Cycles with daily filgrastim prophylaxis were pooled for analyses. CINC was identified based on hospital admissions with a diagnosis of neutropenia, fever, or infection; consequences were characterized in terms of hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and CINC-related healthcare expenditures.

Results: Risk of CINC requiring inpatient care-adjusted for patient characteristics-was 2.4 (95% CI: 1.6-3.4) and 1.9 (1.3-2.8) times higher with 1-3 (N = 8371) and 4-6 (N = 3691) days of filgrastim prophylaxis, respectively, versus ≥7 days (N = 2226). Among subjects who developed CINC, consequences with 1-3 and 4-6 (vs. ≥7) days of filgrastim prophylaxis were: mortality (8.4% [n/N = 10/119] and 4.0% [3/75] vs. 0% [0/34]); LOS (means: 7.4 [N = 243] and 7.1 [N = 99] vs. 6.5 [N = 40]); and expenditures (means: $18,912 [N = 225] and $14,907 [N = 94] vs. $13,165 [N = 39]).

Conclusions: In this retrospective evaluation, shorter courses of daily filgrastim prophylaxis were found to be associated with an increased risk of CINC as well as poorer outcomes among those developing this condition. Because of the limitations inherent in healthcare claims databases specifically and retrospective evaluations generally, additional research addressing these limitations is needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Citing Articles

Drug-induced pneumonitis risk in diffuse large B-cell/follicular lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP-like regimen is associated with the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factors.

Kaprio E, Prusila R, Tokola S, Kuusisto M, Jantunen E, Kuitunen H Cancer Med. 2024; 13(1):e6898.

PMID: 38164067 PMC: 10807566. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6898.


Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.

Aapro M, Chaplin S, Cornes P, Howe S, Link H, Koptelova N Support Care Cancer. 2023; 31(10):581.

PMID: 37728795 PMC: 10511548. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08043-4.


Prescription patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in patients with breast cancer: A real-world study.

Hsu S, Chiang S, Hsu J, Ko Y PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0288642.

PMID: 37459309 PMC: 10351717. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288642.


Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in intermediate-risk regimens: Clinical and economic outcomes of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis.

Aslam S, Li E, Bell E, Lal L, Anderson A, Peterson-Brandt J J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023; 29(2):128-138.

PMID: 36705281 PMC: 10387928. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.2.128.


The Real-World Experience of the Biosimilar (Grastofil) to the Reference Biologic (Neupogen) in Breast Cancer and Lymphoma: A Canadian Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Wong G, Wang K, Pasetka M, Zhang L, Lou J, Majeed H Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(3):1349-1369.

PMID: 35323315 PMC: 8947031. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29030115.


References
1.
Caggiano V, Weiss R, Rickert T, Linde-Zwirble W . Incidence, cost, and mortality of neutropenia hospitalization associated with chemotherapy. Cancer. 2005; 103(9):1916-24. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20983. View

2.
Smith T, Khatcheressian J, Lyman G, Ozer H, Armitage J, Balducci L . 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(19):3187-205. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451. View

3.
Balducci L, Al-Halawani H, Charu V, Tam J, Shahin S, Dreiling L . Elderly cancer patients receiving chemotherapy benefit from first-cycle pegfilgrastim. Oncologist. 2008; 12(12):1416-24. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-12-1416. View

4.
Vogel C, Wojtukiewicz M, Carroll R, Tjulandin S, Barajas-Figueroa L, Wiens B . First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(6):1178-84. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.102. View

5.
Weycker D, Malin J, Barron R, Edelsberg J, Kartashov A, Oster G . Comparative effectiveness of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and sargramostim as prophylaxis against hospitalization for neutropenic complications in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2011; 35(3):267-74. DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31820dc075. View