» Articles » PMID: 24764012

The Fate and Importance of Organics in Drinking Water Treatment: a Review

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Apr 26
PMID 24764012
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the pioneer days, the main driving forces for research of organics in drinking water treatment (DWT) were human health risks and optimisation of technology. The focus was on natural organic matter (NOM) structure, disinfection by-products (DBPs) formation, NOM removal by means of coagulation, adsorption, and oxidation, and development of the most efficient water treatment trains. Surprisingly, after decades of research, rapid development of analytical techniques and progress in risk assessment, the same driving forces are still in the limelight - although the topics have changed slightly. The attention switched from trihalomethanes to a new generation of DBPs. The definition of hydrophilic/hydrophobic NOM depends on the technique used for characterisation. It has become evident that numerous organic compounds can threaten water supply sources. Some of them had been ignored or overlooked in the past, but have recently been detected by advanced analytical tools even in drinking water. Prioritisation becomes priority per se. As far as processes are concerned, mainstream research has been following three lines: fouling mechanisms, application of hybrid processes and interactions between synthetic organic chemicals, other water constituents and materials used in DWT. Significant development has been made in membrane technology. This paper presents a broad overview of the recent organics research. Although the state-of-the-art technologies seem to have an answer to each and every question raised, it is still necessary to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis mainly due to the unique nature of NOM and different xenobiotics that may appear in various types of waters. In the end, human health risk, which derives from the presence/absence of organics, is only the tip of the iceberg - underneath lies a whole new universe - the socio-economic aspect of water treatment and quality that deserves much more attention.

Citing Articles

Charting the landscape of the environmental exposome.

Wei X, Huang Z, Jiang L, Li Y, Zhang X, Leng Y Imeta. 2024; 1(4):e50.

PMID: 38867899 PMC: 10989948. DOI: 10.1002/imt2.50.


Fate of Benzophenone, Benzophenone-3 and Caffeine in Lab-Scale Direct River Water Treatment by Hybrid Processes.

Bogunovic M, Marjanovic T, Ivancev-Tumbas I Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16).

PMID: 34444439 PMC: 8393867. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168691.


Tracking the behavior of different size fractions of dissolved organic matter in a full-scale advanced drinking water treatment plant.

Quang V, Choi I, Hur J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015; 22(22):18176-84.

PMID: 26178836 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-5040-3.

References
1.
Richardson S . Environmental mass spectrometry: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2011; 84(2):747-78. DOI: 10.1021/ac202903d. View

2.
Worch E . Modelling the solute transport under nonequilibrium conditions on the basis of mass transfer equations. J Contam Hydrol. 2003; 68(1-2):97-120. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00091-3. View

3.
Her N, Amy G, McKnight D, Sohn J, Yoon Y . Characterization of DOM as a function of MW by fluorescence EEM and HPLC-SEC using UVA, DOC, and fluorescence detection. Water Res. 2003; 37(17):4295-303. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00317-8. View

4.
Deborde M, von Gunten U . Reactions of chlorine with inorganic and organic compounds during water treatment-Kinetics and mechanisms: a critical review. Water Res. 2007; 42(1-2):13-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.07.025. View

5.
Li Q, Snoeyink V, Campos C, Marinas B . Displacement effect of NOM on atrazine adsorption by PACs with different pore size distributions. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36(7):1510-5. DOI: 10.1021/es010870w. View