» Articles » PMID: 24763922

Face-sex Categorization is Better Above Fixation Than Below: Evidence from the Reach-to-touch Paradigm

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 Apr 26
PMID 24763922
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The masked congruence effect (MCE) elicited by nonconsciously presented faces in a sex-categorization task has recently been shown to be sensitive to the effects of attention. Here we investigated how spatial location along the vertical meridian modulates the MCE for face-sex categorization. Participants made left and right reaching movements to classify the sex of a target face that appeared either immediately above or below central fixation. The target was preceded by a masked prime face that was either congruent (i.e., same sex) or incongruent (i.e., opposite sex) with the target. In the reach-to-touch paradigm, participants typically classify targets more efficiently (i.e., their finger heads in the correct direction earlier and faster) on congruent than on incongruent trials. We observed an upper-hemifield advantage in the time course of this MCE, such that primes affected target classification sooner when they were presented in the upper visual field (UVF) rather than the lower visual field (LVF). Moreover, we observed a differential benefit of attention between the vertical hemifields, in that the MCE was dependent on the appropriate allocation of spatial attention in the LVF, but not the UVF. Taken together, these behavioral findings suggest that the processing of faces qua faces (e.g., sex-categorization) is more robust in upper-hemifield locations.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneity in Category Recognition across the Visual Field.

Shakerian F, Kushki R, Kushki R, Pashkam M, Dehaqani M, Esteky H eNeuro. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39788731 PMC: 11772044. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0331-24.2024.


Color and Spatial Frequency Provide Functional Signatures of Retinotopic Visual Areas.

Loggia S, Duffield S, Braunlich K, Conway B J Neurosci. 2024; 45(2.

PMID: 39496489 PMC: 11714348. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-23.2024.


The vertical position of visual information conditions spatial memory performance in healthy aging.

Durteste M, Van Poucke L, Combariza S, Benziane B, Sahel J, Ramanoel S Commun Psychol. 2024; 1(1):2.

PMID: 39242667 PMC: 11290605. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-023-00002-3.


Effects of Inversion and Fixation Location on the Processing of Face and House Stimuli - A Mass Univariate Analysis.

Siklos-Whillans J, Itier R Brain Topogr. 2024; 37(6):972-992.

PMID: 39042323 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01068-w.


Movement trajectories as a window into the dynamics of emerging neural representations.

Koenig-Robert R, Quek G, Grootswagers T, Varlet M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11499.

PMID: 38769313 PMC: 11106280. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62135-7.


References
1.
Langton , Watt , Bruce I . Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(2):50-59. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01436-9. View

2.
Sereno M, Dale A, Reppas J, Kwong K, Belliveau J, Brady T . Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995; 268(5212):889-93. DOI: 10.1126/science.7754376. View

3.
Carrasco M, Giordano A, McElree B . Temporal performance fields: visual and attentional factors. Vision Res. 2004; 44(12):1351-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.026. View

4.
Levine M, McAnany J . The relative capabilities of the upper and lower visual hemifields. Vision Res. 2005; 45(21):2820-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.001. View

5.
Haxby J, Grady C, Horwitz B, Ungerleider L, Mishkin M, Carson R . Dissociation of object and spatial visual processing pathways in human extrastriate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991; 88(5):1621-5. PMC: 51076. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.5.1621. View