» Articles » PMID: 24762046

Impact of the First Eight Months of Orthodontic Treatment with a Fixed Appliance on the Families of Adolescent Patients

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Apr 26
PMID 24762046
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the first 8 months of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance on the families of adolescent patients and to examine the evaluative properties of the Family Impact Scale (FIS).

Materials And Methods: The study involved a sample of 94 parents/caregivers of adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance. The participants were asked to answer the Brazilian version of the FIS before treatment (T1) and 8 months after the bonding of the fixed appliance (T2). Statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the Bonferroni correction for the overall score and FIS subscales. Responsiveness of the measure and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were also assessed.

Results: Among the 94 participants initially admitted to the present study, two were excluded as a result of treatment dropout and failure to return the second questionnaire. Thus, a sample of 92 parents/caregivers participated (response rate: 97.8%). Among the 92 participants, 70 were the mothers of patients, 16 were fathers, and six were other family members. Statistically significant improvements were found in the overall score (P < .001) as well as in both parental activity and parental emotions subscales (P < .001). The reductions in scores were associated with effect sizes showing moderate clinically meaningful changes in the overall FIS and in the parental/family activity, parental emotions, and family conflict subscales. The MCID was 2.66 for the overall FIS.

Conclusion: The first 8 months of orthodontic treatment with a fixed appliance had a positive impact on the families of adolescents.

Citing Articles

Evidence of Effectiveness of Lingual Orthodontics as an Alternative to Conventional Labial Orthodontics. A Systematic Review.

Ahmed S, Alghabban R, Alqahtani A, Alrehaili K, Aljarullah A, Alghannam A Cureus. 2024; 16(1):e51643.

PMID: 38313975 PMC: 10837819. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51643.


Impacts of childhood malocclusion on the family.

Pipovic J, Uhac M, Perkovic V, Zigante M, Stefanovic N, Spalj S J Orofac Orthop. 2022; 85(3):213-222.

PMID: 36083349 DOI: 10.1007/s00056-022-00422-6.


Validation of an Indian (Kannada) translation of the Family Impact Scale questionnaire and the impact of malocclusion on the families of adolescent school children.

Vinayagamoorthy K, Pentapati K, Urala A, Acharya S Int Dent J. 2020; 70(4):259-265.

PMID: 32266725 PMC: 9379148. DOI: 10.1111/idj.12564.


Effect of malocclusion among adolescents on family quality of life.

Abreu L, Melgaco C, Abreu M, Lages E, Paiva S Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015; 16(4):357-63.

PMID: 25701280 DOI: 10.1007/s40368-014-0172-6.

References
1.
Antunes L, Luiz R, Thome Leao A, Maia L . Initial assessment of responsiveness of the P-CPQ (Brazilian Version) to describe the changes in quality of life after treatment for traumatic dental injury. Dent Traumatol. 2011; 28(4):256-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2011.01094.x. View

2.
Lal S, Parekh S, Mason C, Roberts G . The accompanying adult: authority to give consent in the UK. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007; 17(3):200-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2006.00815.x. View

3.
Malden P, Thomson W, Jokovic A, Locker D . Changes in parent-assessed oral health-related quality of life among young children following dental treatment under general anaesthetic. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2008; 36(2):108-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00374.x. View

4.
Fernandes L, Espeland L, Stenvik A . Patient-centered evaluation of orthodontic care: a longitudinal cohort study of children's and parents' attitudes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999; 115(3):227-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70322-7. View

5.
Theunissen N, Vogels T, Koopman H, Verrips G, Zwinderman K, Verloove-Vanhorick S . The proxy problem: child report versus parent report in health-related quality of life research. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7(5):387-97. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008801802877. View