» Articles » PMID: 24758356

The Italian Version of the Physical Therapy Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire - [PTPSQ-I(15)]: Psychometric Properties in a Sample of Inpatients

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2014 Apr 25
PMID 24758356
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In a previous study we described the translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the PTPSQ [PTPSQ-I(15)] in outpatients. To the authors' knowledge, the PTPSQ was never studied in a hospital setting.The aims of this study were: (1) to establish the psychometric properties of the Physical Therapy Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire [PTPSQ- I(15)] in a sample of Italian inpatients, and (2) to investigate the relationships between the characteristics of patients and physical therapists and the indicators of satisfaction.

Methods: The PTPSQ-I(15) was administered to inpatients in a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. Reliability of the PTPSQ-I(15) was measured by internal consistency (Cronbach's α) and test-retest stability (ICC 3,1). The internal structure was investigated by factor analysis. Divergent validity was measured by comparing the PTPSQ-I(15) with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and with a 5-point Likert-type scale evaluating the Global Perceived Effect (GPE) of the physical therapy treatment.

Results: The PTPSQ-I(15) was administered to 148 inpatients, and 73 completed a second administration. The PTPSQ-I(15) showed high internal consistency (α = 0.949) and test-retest stability (ICC = 0.996). Divergent validity was moderate for the GPE (r = - 0.502, P < 0.001) and strong for the VAS (r = -0.17, P = 0.07). Factor analysis showed a one-factor structure.

Conclusions: The administration of PTPSQ-I(15) to inpatients demonstrated strong psychometric properties and its use can be recommended with Italian-speaking population. Further studies are suggested on the concurrent validity and on the psychometric properties of the PTPSQ-I(15) in different hospital settings or with other pathological conditions.

Citing Articles

Community Pharmacist's Role in Detecting Low Back Pain, and Patient Attitudes-A Cross-Sectional Observational Study in Italian Community Pharmacies.

Giua C, Minghetti P, Gandolini G, Rocco P, Arancio E, Bevacqua T Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16).

PMID: 32824541 PMC: 7460157. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165965.


Construction, Factor Structure, and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Hospital Physical Therapy Perceived Satisfaction Questionnaire (H-PTPS).

Albornoz-Cabello M, Perez-Marmol J, Cardero-Duran M, Barrios-Quinta C, Espejo-Antunez L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16).

PMID: 32806784 PMC: 7459722. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165857.


Patients' perceptions of healthcare professionalism-a Romanian experience.

Popa D, Drugus D, Leasu F, Azoicai D, Repanovici A, Rogozea L BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1):463.

PMID: 28683756 PMC: 5501103. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2412-z.


Which kind of psychometrics is adequate for patient satisfaction questionnaires?.

Konerding U Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10:2083-2090.

PMID: 27784998 PMC: 5063292. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S112398.

References
1.
Berges I, Ottenbacher K, Smith P, Smith D, Ostir G . Perceived pain and satisfaction with medical rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Clin Rehabil. 2006; 20(8):724-30. PMC: 1804256. DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cre1006oa. View

2.
Medina-Mirapeix F, Oliveira-Sousa S, Sobral-Ferreira M, Montilla-Herrador J, Jimeno-Serrano F, Escolar-Reina P . What elements of the informational, management, and relational continuity are associated with patient satisfaction with rehabilitation care and global rating change?. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013; 94(11):2248-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.018. View

3.
Kamper S, Ostelo R, Knol D, Maher C, de Vet H, Hancock M . Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):760-766.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009. View

4.
Marx R, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones E, Warren R . A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003; 56(8):730-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2. View

5.
Dierckx K, Deveugele M, Roosen P, Devisch I . Implementation of shared decision making in physical therapy: observed level of involvement and patient preference. Phys Ther. 2013; 93(10):1321-30. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120286. View