» Articles » PMID: 24758274

A Comprehensive Representation of the Birth-experience: Identification and Prioritization of Birth-specific Domains Based on a Mixed-method Design

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Apr 25
PMID 24758274
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In obstetrics, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness studies often present several specific outcomes with likely contradicting results and may not reflect what is important for women. A birth-specific outcome measure that combines the core domains into one utility score would solve this problem. The aim of this study was to investigate which domains are most relevant for women's overall experience of labor and birth and should be included in such a measure.

Methods: A sequential mixed-method design with three steps was applied. First, the domains were identified by literature review and online focus groups consisting of pregnant women, women who recently gave birth, and their partners. Second, in a prioritizing task, women who recently gave birth and professionals (midwives, gynecologists, and researchers) selected and ranked their top seven domains. Third, the domains that were most frequently selected and had the highest ranking scores determined the basis for a consensus discussion with experts, whereby the definitive list of domains was formed.

Results: In the first step, 34 birth-specific domains were identified, which cover domains regarding the caregivers, intrapersonal aspects of the mother, partner support, and contextual and medical aspects of birth. Based on the prioritizing task results (step 2) of 96 women and 89 professionals, this list was reduced to 14 most relevant domains. In a consensus discussion, the final seven domains were selected by combining several of the 14 remaining domains and giving priority to the domains indicated to be relevant by mothers. The seven definite domains were: 1) availability of competent health professionals; 2) health professionals' support; 3) provision of information; 4) health professionals' response to needs and requests; 5) feelings of safety; 6) worries about the child's health; and 7) experienced duration until the first contact with the child.

Conclusions: The experienced availability and quality of received care, concerns about safety and the baby's health, and first contact with the baby are regarded as key aspects for a mother's overall birth experience. Therefore, these domains are considered to be the most crucial for inclusion in a birth-specific outcome measure.

Citing Articles

Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies.

Benyamini Y, Delicate A, Ayers S, Dikmen-Yildiz P, Gouni O, Jonsdottir S PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0299151.

PMID: 38551936 PMC: 10980232. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299151.


Choice in episiotomy - fact or fantasy: a qualitative study of women's experiences of the consent process.

Djanogly T, Nicholls J, Whitten M, Lanceley A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022; 22(1):139.

PMID: 35189846 PMC: 8862370. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04475-8.


Mothers' and fathers' sense of security in the context of pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period: an integrative literature review.

Werner-Bierwisch T, Pinkert C, Niessen K, Metzing S, Hellmers C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1):473.

PMID: 30509217 PMC: 6278054. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3.


The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Korst L, Fridman M, Saeb S, Greene N, Fink A, Gregory K Health Serv Res. 2018; 53(5):3373-3399.

PMID: 29797513 PMC: 6153166. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12856.


mCME project V.2.0: randomised controlled trial of a revised SMS-based continuing medical education intervention among HIV clinicians in Vietnam.

Gill C, Le N, Halim N, Chi C, Nguyen V, Bonawitz R BMJ Glob Health. 2018; 3(1):e000632.

PMID: 29527350 PMC: 5841494. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000632.


References
1.
Freeman L, Bloemenkamp K, Franssen M, Papatsonis D, Hajenius P, van Huizen M . Remifentanil patient controlled analgesia versus epidural analgesia in labour. A multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:63. PMC: 3464937. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-63. View

2.
Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L . Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: a comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13:108. PMC: 3659073. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108. View

3.
Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M . Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010; 10:81. PMC: 3008689. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81. View

4.
Hollins Martin C, Fleming V . The birth satisfaction scale. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011; 24(2):124-35. DOI: 10.1108/09526861111105086. View

5.
Spaich S, Welzel G, Berlit S, Temerinac D, Tuschy B, Sutterlin M . Mode of delivery and its influence on women's satisfaction with childbirth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 170(2):401-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.07.040. View