» Articles » PMID: 24752701

Psychosocial Interventions to Support Partners of Men with Prostate Cancer: a Systematic and Critical Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal J Cancer Surviv
Specialty Oncology
Date 2014 Apr 23
PMID 24752701
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer poses many challenges for both the man and his partner. Partners have reported a range of issues that impact their own mental health following their partner's diagnosis of prostate cancer. The aim of this review is to summarise and critically evaluate the current literature reporting psychosocial intervention studies for partners of prostate cancer patients.

Methods: An extensive literature search of electronic databases was conducted (OvidMEDLINE 1946, 26th September 2013, and psychINFO 1967, 26th September 2013) using the keywords prostate cancer AND intervention* OR therapy* OR psychosocial intervention* OR support* AND couple* or Spouse* or Partner* or Intimate partner* matched to the title as well as secondary scanning of reference lists. Studies were included if they described interventions for partners of prostate cancer patients, either solely for the partners or as a couple, intended to alleviate distress and enhance the partner's or couple's quality of life, and reported a measurable outcome for partners.

Results: A total of 11 prostate cancer-specific intervention studies that included partners and reported separate results for the partners were found. Only one of these interventions was partner specific, the other eight involved the patient-partner dyad. The studies identified primarily focussed on two areas: emotional distress and sexual intimacy, and mixed findings were reported for efficacy of interventions.

Conclusions: Despite strong evidence that partners of men with prostate cancer experience difficulties associated with the impact of prostate cancer, there is limited research that has investigated the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for partners. Of the reviewed studies, it is evident that interventions targeting the reduction of emotional distress, improved communication and sexual intimacy between the couple and utilisation of strategies that enable partners to express their distress, learn new strategies and implement behavioural change show the most promising results in enhancing partner well-being.

Implications For Cancer Survivors: Significant progress is required in developing and evaluating appropriate and effective psychosocial support interventions for partners of prostate cancer survivors as partners appear to have significant unmet needs in this area.

Citing Articles

Risks of depression, anxiety, and suicide in partners of men with prostate cancer: a national cohort study.

Crump C, Stattin P, Brooks J, Sundquist J, Edwards A, Sundquist K J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023; 116(5):745-752.

PMID: 38060258 PMC: 11077310. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad257.


Understanding the sexual health perceptions, concerns, and needs of female partners of prostate cancer survivors.

Gupta N, Zebib L, Wittmann D, Nelson C, Salter C, Mulhall J J Sex Med. 2023; 20(5):651-660.

PMID: 36941211 PMC: 10149377. DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad027.


Health-related quality of life of advanced prostate cancer patients and spouses: results from actor-partner interdependence models.

Sauer C, Ihrig A, Hanslmeier T, Huber J, Hiller K, Friederich H Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(8):6985-6993.

PMID: 35556168 PMC: 9213378. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07100-8.


Development of cancer support services for patients and their close ones from the Cancer Society of Finland's perspective.

Tiirola H, Poutanen V, Vornanen R, Pylkkanen L Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021; 16(1):1915737.

PMID: 33880972 PMC: 8079123. DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1915737.


Prostate cancer.

Rebello R, Oing C, Knudsen K, Loeb S, Johnson D, Reiter R Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021; 7(1):9.

PMID: 33542230 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-020-00243-0.


References
1.
Canada A, Neese L, Sui D, Schover L . Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 104(12):2689-700. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21537. View

2.
Resendes L, McCorkle R . Spousal responses to prostate cancer: an integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2006; 24(2):192-8. DOI: 10.1080/07357900500524652. View

3.
Nguyen L, Pollack A, Zagars G . Late effects after radiotherapy for prostate cancer in a randomized dose-response study: results of a self-assessment questionnaire. Urology. 1998; 51(6):991-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00028-4. View

4.
Perez M, Skinner E, Meyerowitz B . Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives. Health Psychol. 2002; 21(3):288-93. View

5.
McCorkle R, Siefert M, Dowd M, Robinson J, Pickett M . Effects of advanced practice nursing on patient and spouse depressive symptoms, sexual function, and marital interaction after radical prostatectomy. Urol Nurs. 2007; 27(1):65-77. View