» Articles » PMID: 24750712

Long-term Treatment Outcomes After Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation and Stent Placement for Atherosclerotic Subclavian Artery Obstructive Lesions

Overview
Journal Neuroradiol J
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2014 Apr 23
PMID 24750712
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine long-term outcomes after stent placement for subclavian artery (SA) obstructive lesions assisted by intraoperative intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The study included 25 lesions in 24 patients who underwent stent placement assisted by intraoperative IVUS for subclavian artery stenosis or obstruction at our hospital between January 2003 and August 2010. Outcome was evaluated based on the results within 30 postoperative days (technical success rate, improvement in upper extremity ischemia, steal syndrome, left-right blood pressure difference, and perioperative complications) and the results after 30 postoperative days (incidence of vertebrobasilar artery territory infarction and restenosis). Stent placement and vessel dilatation were successful in all patients, without perioperative complications. Upper extremity ischemia, steal syndrome, and left-right blood pressure difference disappeared in all cases. During follow-up observation (6-96 months; median 51 months), no restenosis occurred at the stent placement site in any patient. In one case, four years after initial treatment, stenosis was noted proximal to the stent placement site. Satisfactory long-term as well as short-term outcomes were achieved after stent placement for SA obstructive lesions assisted by intraoperative IVUS evaluation.

Citing Articles

Significance of hemodynamic assessment by pressure wire for endovascular therapy of subclavian steal syndrome.

Chen D, Gao Y, Shi J, Yin Y, Zhang W Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 26(3):321-328.

PMID: 31969074 PMC: 7254624. DOI: 10.1177/1591019919897765.


Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound in Clinical Practice.

Vasquez A, Mistry N, Singh J Interv Cardiol. 2018; 9(3):156-163.

PMID: 29588795 PMC: 5808501. DOI: 10.15420/icr.2014.9.3.156.

References
1.
Vitti M, Thompson B, Read R, Gagne P, Barone G, BARNES R . Carotid-subclavian bypass: a twenty-two-year experience. J Vasc Surg. 1994; 20(3):411-7; discussion 417-8. DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90140-6. View

2.
Patel S, White C, Collins T, Daniel G, Jenkins J, Reilly J . Catheter-based treatment of the subclavian and innominate arteries. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008; 71(7):963-8. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21549. View

3.
Sixt S, Rastan A, Schwarzwalder U, Burgelin K, Noory E, Schwarz T . Results after balloon angioplasty or stenting of atherosclerotic subclavian artery obstruction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 73(3):395-403. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21836. View

4.
Brountzos E, Petersen B, Binkert C, Panagiotou I, Kaufman J . Primary stenting of subclavian and innominate artery occlusive disease: a single center's experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2004; 27(6):616-23. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-004-0218-y. View

5.
Brott T, Halperin J, Abbara S, Bacharach J, Barr J, Bush R . 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association.... J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 57(8):e16-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.006. View