» Articles » PMID: 24747198

Validation of Methods to Control for Immortal Time Bias in a Pharmacoepidemiologic Analysis of Renin-angiotensin System Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Apr 22
PMID 24747198
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pharmacoepidemiologic analysis can confirm whether drug efficacy in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) translates to effectiveness in real settings. We examined methods used to control for immortal time bias in an analysis of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors as the reference cardioprotective drug.

Methods: We analyzed data from 3928 patients with type 2 diabetes who were recruited into the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry between 1996 and 2005 and followed up to July 30, 2005. Different Cox models were used to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with RAS inhibitors. These HRs were then compared to the HR of 0.92 reported in a recent meta-analysis of RCTs.

Results: During a median follow-up period of 5.45 years, 7.23% (n = 284) patients developed CVD and 38.7% (n = 1519) were started on RAS inhibitors, with 39.1% of immortal time among the users. In multivariable analysis, time-dependent drug-exposure Cox models and Cox models that moved immortal time from users to nonusers both severely inflated the HR, and time-fixed models that included immortal time deflated the HR. Use of time-fixed Cox models that excluded immortal time resulted in a HR of only 0.89 (95% CI, 0.68-1.17) for CVD associated with RAS inhibitors, which is closer to the values reported in RCTs.

Conclusions: In pharmacoepidemiologic analysis, time-dependent drug exposure models and models that move immortal time from users to nonusers may introduce substantial bias in investigations of the effects of RAS inhibitors on CVD in type 2 diabetes.

Citing Articles

Does severe subacute noise exposure increase risk of new onset hypertension beyond conventional risk factors? A 30 000 person-years cohort study.

Yun B, Sim J, Jeong I, Lee S, Kim S, Cho A J Hypertens. 2021; 40(3):588-595.

PMID: 34889865 PMC: 8815848. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003052.


Occupational Noise Exposure and Incidence of High Fasting Blood Glucose: A 3-Year, Multicenter, Retrospective Study.

Kim S, Yun B, Lee S, Kim C, Sim J, Cho A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17).

PMID: 34501978 PMC: 8431404. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179388.


NSAID use is not associated with Parkinson's disease incidence: A Norwegian Prescription Database study.

Brakedal B, Tzoulis C, Tysnes O, Haugarvoll K PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0256602.

PMID: 34492069 PMC: 8423296. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256602.


Metformin and Reduced Risk of Cancer in the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry: Real Effect or Immortal Time Bias?.

Zhang Z J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(7):1154-1157.

PMID: 31025306 PMC: 6614235. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04982-z.


Differences in the risk of cardiovascular disease for movers and stayers in New Zealand: a survival analysis.

Darlington-Pollock F, Shackleton N, Norman P, Lee A, Exeter D Int J Public Health. 2017; 63(2):173-179.

PMID: 28707009 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-017-1011-4.


References
1.
Suissa S . Immortal time bias in pharmaco-epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 167(4):492-9. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm324. View

2.
Salas M, Hofman A, Stricker B . Confounding by indication: an example of variation in the use of epidemiologic terminology. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 149(11):981-3. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009758. View

3.
Yang X, So W, Ma R, Ko G, Kong A, Lam C . Effects of albuminuria and renal dysfunction on development of dyslipidaemia in type 2 diabetes--the Hong Kong Diabetes Registry. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008; 23(9):2834-40. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn149. View

4.
Liu C, Shau W, Chang C, Wu C, Lai M . Pneumonia risk and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers. J Epidemiol. 2013; 23(5):344-50. PMC: 3775528. DOI: 10.2188/jea.je20120112. View

5.
Suissa S . Immortal time bias in observational studies of drug effects. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007; 16(3):241-9. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1357. View