» Articles » PMID: 24742777

The Frequency of Diagnostic Errors in Outpatient Care: Estimations from Three Large Observational Studies Involving US Adult Populations

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Apr 19
PMID 24742777
Citations 190
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.

Methods: Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).

Results: Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.

Conclusions: Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.

Citing Articles

Retrospective audit reviewing accuracy of clinical diagnosis of geographic atrophy in a single centre private tertiary retinal practice in Australia.

Markakis D, Britten-Jones A, Guymer R, Edwards T, Hall A, Kerr N Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8528.

PMID: 40074767 PMC: 11903886. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-90516-z.


Exploring sociodemographic disparities in diagnostic problems and mistakes in the quest for diagnostic equity: insights from a national survey of patient experiences.

McDonald K, Gleason K, Grob R, Yuan C, Dhingra I, Evered J Front Public Health. 2025; 13:1444005.

PMID: 40017549 PMC: 11865055. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1444005.


Patient safety in eye care: a multi-method analysis of reported incidents involving implementation of care and clinical assessment in England and Wales.

Acton J, McFadzean J, Lau C, Foo J, Carson-Stevens A Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39948402 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03669-6.


Engaging older adults in diagnostic safety: implementing a diagnostic communication note sheet in a primary care setting.

Tran A, Blackall L, Hill M, Gallagher W Front Health Serv. 2025; 4:1474195.

PMID: 39872036 PMC: 11769972. DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1474195.


Identifying clusters of raters with a common notion of diagnosing erosive tooth wear: a step towards improving the accuracy of diagnostic procedures.

Vach K, Ganss C, Schlueter N, Vach W Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):15.

PMID: 39780271 PMC: 11716257. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-02260-1.


References
1.
Phillips Jr R, Bartholomew L, Dovey S, Fryer Jr G, Miyoshi T, Green L . Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13(2):121-6. PMC: 1743812. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008029. View

2.
Thomas E, Studdert D, Burstin H, Orav E, Zeena T, Williams E . Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000; 38(3):261-71. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00003. View

3.
Jones R, Price D, Ryan D, Sims E, von Ziegenweidt J, Mascarenhas L . Opportunities to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in routine care in the UK: a retrospective study of a clinical cohort. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2(4):267-76. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70008-6. View

4.
Shojania K, Burton E . The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(9):873-5. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp0707996. View

5.
Singh H, Giardina T, Forjuoh S, Reis M, Kosmach S, Khan M . Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011; 21(2):93-100. PMC: 3680372. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000304. View