» Articles » PMID: 24741418

Clinical Significance of National Institutes of Health Classification in Patients with Chronic Prostatitis/chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Overview
Journal Korean J Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2014 Apr 18
PMID 24741418
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We determined the effects of alpha-blockers and quinolone in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) classified by National Institute of Health (NIH) consensus group.

Materials And Methods: Data from a total of 111 patients who were diagnosed with CP/CPPS between June 2010 and June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were classified into group 1 (category IIIA, n=40) and group 2 (category IIIB, n=71). Treatment using alfuzosin and levofloxacin was given to both groups for 6 weeks. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and NIH Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index were measured before and after therapy.

Results: Group 1 had a significant decrease in total IPSS score, CPSI pain score, CPSI quality of life (QoL) score, and total CPSI score (p=0.043, p=0.006, p=0.015, and p=0.006, respectively). Group 2 had a significant decrease in IPSS voiding symptom score, IPSS storage symptom score, total IPSS, CPSI pain score, CPSI voiding score, CPSI QoL score, and total CPSI score (p=0.002, p=0.004, p=0.001, p=0.001, p=0.006, p=0.001, and p=0.001, respectively). The CPSI score was reduced by 6 points or more in 50.0% of patients (n=18) in group 1 and in 51.6% of patients (n=32) in group 2. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the changes in IPSS and CPSI scores across the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Although combination treatment reduced the CPSI score in both groups, there was no significant difference between the groups after combination treatment. We suggest that factors other than inflammation also contribute to symptoms associated with CP/CPPS.

Citing Articles

Using the UPOINT system to manage men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Bryk D, Shoskes D Arab J Urol. 2021; 19(3):387-393.

PMID: 34552790 PMC: 8451687. DOI: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.1955546.


Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Disease or Symptom? Current Perspectives on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.

Zhang J, Liang C, Shang X, Li H Am J Mens Health. 2020; 14(1):1557988320903200.

PMID: 32005088 PMC: 7256330. DOI: 10.1177/1557988320903200.


Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Dialyzable Leukocyte Extract in Autoimmune Prostatitis: Evaluation in Animal Model.

Perez-Alvarado C, Gomez C, Reyes M, Garcia M, Perez E, Perez de la Mora C Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:1832853.

PMID: 28386549 PMC: 5366182. DOI: 10.1155/2017/1832853.


Multimodal therapy for category III chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in UPOINTS phenotyped patients.

Magri V, Marras E, Restelli A, Wagenlehner F, Perletti G Exp Ther Med. 2015; 9(3):658-666.

PMID: 25667610 PMC: 4316954. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2014.2152.

References
1.
Bjerklund Johansen T, Gruneberg R, Guibert J, Hofstetter A, Lobel B, Naber K . The role of antibiotics in the treatment of chronic prostatitis: a consensus statement. Eur Urol. 1998; 34(6):457-66. DOI: 10.1159/000019784. View

2.
Nickel J . Classification and diagnosis of prostatitis: a gold standard?. Andrologia. 2003; 35(3):160-7. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0272.2003.00557.x. View

3.
Shoskes D, Nickel J, Rackley R, Pontari M . Clinical phenotyping in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and interstitial cystitis: a management strategy for urologic chronic pelvic pain syndromes. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2008; 12(2):177-83. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2008.42. View

4.
McNaughton Collins M, Fowler Jr F, Elliott D, Albertsen P, Barry M . Diagnosing and treating chronic prostatitis: do urologists use the four-glass test?. Urology. 2000; 55(3):403-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00536-1. View

5.
Nickel J, Downey J, Johnston B, Clark J . Predictors of patient response to antibiotic therapy for the chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. J Urol. 2001; 165(5):1539-44. View