» Articles » PMID: 24735662

[Comparison Study of Visual Function and Patient Satisfaction in Patients with Monovision and Patients with Bilateral Multifocal Intraocular Lenses]

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 Apr 17
PMID 24735662
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare visual function and patient satisfaction in patients with bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses (IOL) and patients with monofocal IOL monovision.

Methods: Prospective nonrandomized controlled study. This study comprised consecutive bilateral cataract patients 45 cases (90eyes) between January 2011 and March 2012. All cases were divided into two groups: multifocal IOL group (23 patients) having implantation of AcrySof ReSTOR +3D(SN6AD1) multifocal IOL, monovision group (22 patients) having implantation of AcrySof IQ (SN60WF) IOL. Parameters analyzed 3 months postoperatively included binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities; stereo vision;photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity function without glare. Parameters analyzed 6 months postoperatively included spectacle independence; subjective visual symptoms; and patient satisfaction. The independent-samples t test were used to compare the measure data which met normal distribution. The chi-square test was applied to compare categorical variables.

Results: There were no significant differences between groups in bilateral uncorrected distance vision (0.13 ± 0.06, 0.17 ± 0.19; Z = 1.755, P = 0.086) , intermediate (0.34 ± 0.05,0.33 ± 0.06; Z = -0.821, P = 0.416) , and near vision (0.35 ± 0.06, 0.41 ± 0.09; Z = 2.117, P = 0.051) . There were significant differences between groups in stereo vision (Median: 150″, 525″; Z = -2.092, P = 0.036) . Percentage of patients wearing spectacle were less than 10% in all groups [91.3% (21/23), 90.9% (20/22) ].On the questionnaire, patients in multifocal IOL group complained with double vision, trouble in night vision and halo(21.7%).

Conclusions: Pseudophakic monovision and MIOL achieved distance vision, intermediate vision and near vision. But monovision was no risk for disturbing visual symptoms associated with multifocal IOL.

Citing Articles

Visual outcomes, spectacle independence, and patient satisfaction of pseudophakic mini-monovision using a new monofocal intraocular lens.

Park E, Ahn H, Han S, Jun I, Seo K, Kim E Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):21716.

PMID: 36522397 PMC: 9755282. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26315-7.


Spectacle Independence And Patient Satisfaction With Pseudophakic Mini-Monovision Using Aberration-Free Intraocular Lens.

Hafez T, Helaly H Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13:2111-2117.

PMID: 31802840 PMC: 6827509. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S215229.


Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost.

Goldberg D, Goldberg M, Shah R, Meagher J, Ailani H BMC Ophthalmol. 2018; 18(1):293.

PMID: 30413145 PMC: 6230294. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0963-3.


A systematic review of pseudophakic monovision for presbyopia correction.

Labiris G, Toli A, Perente A, Ntonti P, Kozobolis V Int J Ophthalmol. 2017; 10(6):992-1000.

PMID: 28730093 PMC: 5515155. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2017.06.24.


Comparison of pseudophakic retinal straylight in spherical/aspherical and hydrophobic/hydrophilic intraocular lens.

Tang Y, Song H, Chen J, Tang X Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(6):1146-50.

PMID: 26682163 PMC: 4651879. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.06.12.