» Articles » PMID: 24734039

Physician Perceptions on Colonoscopy Quality: Results of a National Survey of Gastroenterologists

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2014 Apr 16
PMID 24734039
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background. Quality indicators for colonoscopy have been developed, but the uptake of these metrics into practice is uncertain. Our aims were to assess physician perceptions regarding colonoscopy quality measurement and to quantify the perceived impact of quality measurement on clinical practice. Methods. We conducted in-person interviews with 15 gastroenterologists about their perceptions regarding colonoscopy quality. Results from these interviews informed the development of a 34-question web-based survey that was emailed to 1,500 randomlyselected members of the American College of Gastroenterology. Results. 160 invitations were undeliverable, and 167 out of 1340 invited physicians (12.5%) participated in the survey. Respondents and nonrespondents did not differ in age, sex, practice setting, or years since training. 38.8% of respondents receive feedback on their colonoscopy quality. The majority of respondents agreed with the use of completion rate (90%) and adenoma detection rate (83%) as quality indicators but there was less enthusiasm for withdrawal time (61%). 24% of respondents reported usually or always removing diminutive polyps solely to increase their adenoma detection rate, and 20% reported prolonging their procedure time to meet withdrawal time standards. Conclusions. A minority of respondents receives feedback on the quality of their colonoscopy. Interventions to increase continuous quality improvement in colonoscopy screening are needed.

Citing Articles

The clinical and economic consequences of practice style variations in common surgical interventions: A protocol for systematic review.

Nouhi M, Hadian M, Olyaeemanesh A Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97(42):e12439.

PMID: 30334941 PMC: 6211928. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012439.

References
1.
Mysliwiec P, Brown M, Klabunde C, Ransohoff D . Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 141(4):264-71. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-4-200408170-00006. View

2.
Hsieh H, Shannon S . Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(9):1277-88. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687. View

3.
Schenck A, Peacock S, Klabunde C, Lapin P, Coan J, Brown M . Trends in colorectal cancer test use in the medicare population, 1998-2005. Am J Prev Med. 2009; 37(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.03.009. View

4.
Kappelman M, Dorn S, Peterson E, Runge T, Allen J . Quality of care for gastrointestinal conditions: a primer for gastroenterologists. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011; 106(7):1182-7. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.118. View

5.
Kilbourne A, Keyser D, Pincus H . Challenges and opportunities in measuring the quality of mental health care. Can J Psychiatry. 2010; 55(9):549-57. PMC: 3084488. DOI: 10.1177/070674371005500903. View