» Articles » PMID: 24731249

Disappointment and Adherence Among Parents of Newborns Allocated to the Control Group: a Qualitative Study of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Trials
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Apr 16
PMID 24731249
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When a child participates in a clinical trial, informed consent has to be given by the parents. Parental motives for participation are complex, but the hope of getting a new and better treatment for the child is important. We wondered how parents react when their child is allocated to the control group of a randomized controlled trial, and how it will affect their future engagement in the trial.

Methods: We included parents of newborns randomized to the control arm in the Danish Calmette study at Rigshospitalet in Copenhagen. The Calmette study is a randomized clinical trial investigating the non-specific effects of early BCG-vaccine to healthy neonates. Randomization is performed immediately after birth and parents are not blinded to the allocation. We set up a semi-structured focus group with six parents from four families. Afterwards we telephone-interviewed another 19 mothers to achieve saturation. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across the data sets.

Results: The parents reported good understanding of the randomization process. Their most common reaction to allocation was disappointment, though relief was also seen. A model of reactions to being allocated to the control group was developed based on the participants' different positions along two continuities from 'Our participation in trial is not important' to 'Our participation in trial is important', and 'Vaccine not important to us' to 'Vaccine important to us'. Four very disappointed families had thought of getting the vaccine elsewhere, and one had actually had their child vaccinated. All parents involved in the focus group and the telephone interviews wanted to participate in the follow-ups planned for the Calmette study.

Conclusions: This study identified an almost universal experience of disappointment among parents of newborns who were randomized to the control group, but also a broad expression of understanding and accepting the idea of randomization. The trial staff might use the model of reactions in understanding the parents' disappointment and in this way support their motives for participation. A generalized version might be applicable across randomized controlled trials at large.

Trial Registration: The Calmette study is registered in EudraCT (https://eudract.ema.europa.eu/) with trial number 2010-021979-85.

Citing Articles

Seeing the Truth About Double Blinding.

Redelmeier D, Zipursky J J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(16):3322-3329.

PMID: 39012541 PMC: 11618566. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08887-4.


Acute Effects of a Warm-Up Intervention on Pain, Productivity, Physical Capacities and Psychological Perceptions Among Vineyard Workers: a Cluster Randomized Trial.

Larinier N, Vuillerme N, Jadaud A, Malherbe S, Giraud E, Balaguier R J Occup Rehabil. 2023; 34(1):100-115.

PMID: 37635160 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-023-10134-2.


Endometrial scratch to increase live birth rates in women undergoing first-time in vitro fertilisation: RCT and systematic review.

Metwally M, Chatters R, Pye C, Dimairo M, White D, Walters S Health Technol Assess. 2022; 26(10):1-212.

PMID: 35129113 PMC: 8859770. DOI: 10.3310/JNZT9406.


Experiences of trial participants and site staff of participating in and running a large randomised trial within fertility (the endometrial scratch trial): a qualitative interview study.

Chatters R, White D, Pye C, Petrovic A, Sizer A, Kumar P BMJ Open. 2021; 11(9):e051698.

PMID: 34531221 PMC: 8449983. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051698.


Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list.

Aurich B, Vermeulen E, Elie V, Driessens M, Kubiak C, Bonifazi D BMJ Paediatr Open. 2021; 4(1):e000847.

PMID: 33437878 PMC: 7778778. DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000847.


References
1.
Sammons H, Atkinson M, Choonara I, Stephenson T . What motivates British parents to consent for research? A questionnaire study. BMC Pediatr. 2007; 7:12. PMC: 1828728. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-12. View

2.
Rothmier J, Lasley M, Shapiro G . Factors influencing parental consent in pediatric clinical research. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 Pt 1):1037-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.111.5.1037. View

3.
Schron E, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Pressel S . Clinical trial participant satisfaction: survey of SHEP enrollees. SHEP Cooperative Research Group. Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997; 45(8):934-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02962.x. View

4.
Henzlova M, Blackburn G, Bradley E, Rogers W . Patient perception of a long-term clinical trial: experience using a close-out questionnaire in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Trial. SOLVD Close-out Working Group. Control Clin Trials. 1994; 15(4):284-93. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(94)90044-2. View

5.
Stryker J, Wray R, Emmons K, Winer E, Demetri G . Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret. Patient Educ Couns. 2005; 63(1-2):104-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.09.006. View