» Articles » PMID: 24715870

Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion (LLIF): Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Versus PLIF/TLIF and Predictive Factors Affecting LLIF Outcome

Overview
Publisher Thieme
Date 2014 Apr 10
PMID 24715870
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Systematic review.

Study Rationale: The surgical treatment of adult degenerative lumbar conditions remains controversial. Conventional techniques include posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A new direct approach known as lumbar lateral interbody fusion (LLIF), or extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF(®)) or direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF), has been introduced. Objectives The objective of this article is to determine the comparative effectiveness and safety of LLIF, at one or more levels with or without instrumentation, versus PLIF or TLIF surgery in adults with lumbar degenerative conditions, and to determine which preoperative factors affect patient outcomes following LLIF surgery.

Materials And Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed and bibliographies of key articles. Articles were reviewed by two independent reviewers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each article was evaluated using a predefined quality rating scheme.

Results: The search yielded 258 citations and the following met our inclusion criteria: three retrospective cohort studies (all using historical cohorts) (class of evidence [CoE] III) examining the comparative effectiveness and safety of LLIF/XLIF(®)/DLIF versus PLIF or TLIF surgery, and one prospective cohort study (CoE II) and two retrospective cohort studies (CoE III) assessing factors affecting patient outcome following LLIF. Patients in the LLIF group experienced less estimated blood loss and a lower mortality risk compared with the PLIF group. The number of levels treated and the preoperative diagnosis were significant predictors of perioperative or early complications in two studies.

Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence of the comparative effectiveness of LLIF versus PLIF/TLIF surgery. There is low-quality evidence suggesting that LLIF surgery results in fewer complications or reoperations than PLIF/TLIF surgery. And there is insufficient evidence that any preoperative factors exist that predict patient outcome after LLIF surgery.

Citing Articles

The effects of cage on endplate collapse after stand-alone OLIF: based on finite element analysis and mechanics experiments.

Li H, Liu J, Cui H, Shen N, Wu F, Zhang Z Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1508385.

PMID: 39723127 PMC: 11669059. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1508385.


Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Tricalcium Phosphate and Iliac Bone Graft Compared With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Local Bone Graft in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery in Thailand.

Tirawanish P, Phisalprapa P, Kositamongkol C, Korwutthikulrangsri E, Ruangchainikom M, Sutipornpalangkul W Int J Spine Surg. 2024; 18(5):490-501.

PMID: 38886013 PMC: 11616388. DOI: 10.14444/8615.


Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) with Lateral Modular Plate Fixation: Preliminary Report on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes.

Armocida D, Perna A, Cofano F, Cimatti M, Arcidiacono U, Marengo N Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023; 135:431-437.

PMID: 38153505 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-36084-8_66.


Lateral approach to the lumbar spine: The utility of an access surgeon.

Meade M, Lee Y, Brush P, Lambrechts M, Jenkins E, DeSimone C J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023; 14(3):281-287.

PMID: 37860021 PMC: 10583800. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_78_23.


Establishing a Standardized Clinical Consensus for Reporting Complications Following Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Mundis Jr G, Ito K, Lakomkin N, Shahidi B, Malone H, Iannacone T Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(6).

PMID: 37374353 PMC: 10301923. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59061149.


References
1.
Isaacs R, Hyde J, Goodrich J, Rodgers W, Phillips F . A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(26 Suppl):S322-30. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022e04. View

2.
Wright J, Swiontkowski M, Heckman J . Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(1):1-3. View

3.
Rodgers W, Cox C, Gerber E . Early complications of extreme lateral interbody fusion in the obese. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23(6):393-7. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181b31729. View

4.
Deluzio K, Lucio J, Rodgers W . Value and cost in less invasive spinal fusion surgery: lessons from a community hospital. SAS J. 2015; 4(2):37-40. PMC: 4365613. DOI: 10.1016/j.esas.2010.03.004. View

5.
Caputo A, Michael K, Chapman T, Jennings J, Hubbard E, Isaacs R . Extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis. J Clin Neurosci. 2013; 20(11):1558-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.12.024. View