» Articles » PMID: 24715559

Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Clinical Diagnosis, Nomenclature and Severity Assessment

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Apr 10
PMID 24715559
Citations 271
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, the genetic heterogeneity in osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), proposed in 1979 by Sillence et al., has been confirmed with molecular genetic studies. At present, 17 genetic causes of OI and closely related disorders have been identified and it is expected that more will follow. Unlike most reviews that have been published in the last decade on the genetic causes and biochemical processes leading to OI, this review focuses on the clinical classification of OI and elaborates on the newly proposed OI classification from 2010, which returned to a descriptive and numerical grouping of five OI syndromic groups. The new OI nomenclature and the pre-and postnatal severity assessment introduced in this review, emphasize the importance of phenotyping in order to diagnose, classify, and assess severity of OI. This will provide patients and their families with insight into the probable course of the disorder and it will allow physicians to evaluate the effect of therapy. A careful clinical description in combination with knowledge of the specific molecular genetic cause is the starting point for development and assessment of therapy in patients with heritable disorders including OI. © 2014 The Authors. American Journal of Medical Genetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Citing Articles

Most infants with prenatal osteogenesis imperfecta diagnosis and poor prognosis survive: experience of a quaternary care osteogenesis imperfecta center.

Carroll R, Little S, McGreal T, Bonner S, Willis D, Franzone J JBMR Plus. 2025; 9(4):ziaf022.

PMID: 40070560 PMC: 11894799. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf022.


Protein disulfide isomerase is essential for osteoblast differentiation in mice.

Lu Y, Yang A, Zhao Z, Han Y, Wu D, Wu Y Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):402.

PMID: 40065084 PMC: 11894140. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07824-3.


Factors influencing quality of life in Indonesian children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Satriono K, Amalia G, Andarie A, Wiguna T, Pardede S, Soesanti F Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025; 30(4):174-182.

PMID: 39963054 PMC: 11809551. DOI: 10.5114/pedm.2024.142588.


Calcium-phosphate metabolism - selected disorders in children.

Jakubowska-Pietkiewicz E Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025; 30(4):169-173.

PMID: 39963053 PMC: 11809548. DOI: 10.5114/pedm.2024.146682.


Pleiotropic effects of a recessive Col1a2 mutation occurring in a mouse model of severe osteogenesis imperfecta.

Corcelli M, Sagar R, Petzendorfer E, Hasan M, van Dijk F, David A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0309801.

PMID: 39908220 PMC: 11798436. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309801.


References
1.
Astrom E, Jorulf H, Soderhall S . Intravenous pamidronate treatment of infants with severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Arch Dis Child. 2006; 92(4):332-8. PMC: 2083683. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.096552. View

2.
Forlino A, Cabral W, Barnes A, Marini J . New perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011; 7(9):540-57. PMC: 3443407. DOI: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.81. View

3.
Volodarsky M, Markus B, Cohen I, Staretz-Chacham O, Flusser H, Landau D . A deletion mutation in TMEM38B associated with autosomal recessive osteogenesis imperfecta. Hum Mutat. 2013; 34(4):582-6. DOI: 10.1002/humu.22274. View

4.
Keupp K, Beleggia F, Kayserili H, Barnes A, Steiner M, Semler O . Mutations in WNT1 cause different forms of bone fragility. Am J Hum Genet. 2013; 92(4):565-74. PMC: 3617378. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.02.010. View

5.
Sillence D, Butler B, Latham M, Barlow K . Natural history of blue sclerae in osteogenesis imperfecta. Am J Med Genet. 1993; 45(2):183-6. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.1320450207. View