» Articles » PMID: 24714528

Geographical Inequalities in Use of Improved Drinking Water Supply and Sanitation Across Sub-Saharan Africa: Mapping and Spatial Analysis of Cross-sectional Survey Data

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2014 Apr 10
PMID 24714528
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Understanding geographic inequalities in coverage of drinking-water supply and sanitation (WSS) will help track progress towards universal coverage of water and sanitation by identifying marginalized populations, thus helping to control a large number of infectious diseases. This paper uses household survey data to develop comprehensive maps of WSS coverage at high spatial resolution for sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Analysis is extended to investigate geographic heterogeneity and relative geographic inequality within countries.

Methods And Findings: Cluster-level data on household reported use of improved drinking-water supply, sanitation, and open defecation were abstracted from 138 national surveys undertaken from 1991-2012 in 41 countries. Spatially explicit logistic regression models were developed and fitted within a Bayesian framework, and used to predict coverage at the second administrative level (admin2, e.g., district) across SSA for 2012. Results reveal substantial geographical inequalities in predicted use of water and sanitation that exceed urban-rural disparities. The average range in coverage seen between admin2 within countries was 55% for improved drinking water, 54% for use of improved sanitation, and 59% for dependence upon open defecation. There was also some evidence that countries with higher levels of inequality relative to coverage in use of an improved drinking-water source also experienced higher levels of inequality in use of improved sanitation (rural populations r = 0.47, p = 0.002; urban populations r = 0.39, p = 0.01). Results are limited by the quantity of WSS data available, which varies considerably by country, and by the reliability and utility of available indicators.

Conclusions: This study identifies important geographic inequalities in use of WSS previously hidden within national statistics, confirming the necessity for targeted policies and metrics that reach the most marginalized populations. The presented maps and analysis approach can provide a mechanism for monitoring future reductions in inequality within countries, reflecting priorities of the post-2015 development agenda. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Citing Articles

Geospatial distribution of unimproved water source and sanitation facilities in Ethiopia: evidence from the latest demographic and health survey (2019).

Azanaw J, Melese M, Melaku M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):255.

PMID: 39747913 PMC: 11696102. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82688-x.


Temporal trends and spatial heterogeneity of sanitation facilities in Ethiopia: evidence from the 2005-2019 Demographic and Health Surveys.

Azanaw J, Tsegaye M, Mesele W BMJ Open. 2024; 14(12):e088211.

PMID: 39627146 PMC: 11624780. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088211.


Mapping inequalities in health service coverage in Africa: a scoping review.

Karamagi H, Afriyie D, Ben Charif A, Sy S, Kipruto H, Moyo T BMJ Open. 2024; 14(11):e082918.

PMID: 39581717 PMC: 11590813. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082918.


Rural-urban disparities in basic sanitation access among households: a multivariable decomposition analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health survey 2019.

Keleb A, Daba C, Endawkie A, Asmare L, Bayou F, Abeje E Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1420077.

PMID: 39568612 PMC: 11577787. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1420077.


Measuring spatial inequalities in maternal and child mortalities in Pakistan: evidence from geographically weighted regression.

Muhammad F, Shahabudin S, Talib M BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2229.

PMID: 39152373 PMC: 11328511. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19682-5.


References
1.
Clasen T, Fabini D, Boisson S, Taneja J, Song J, Aichinger E . Making sanitation count: developing and testing a device for assessing latrine use in low-income settings. Environ Sci Technol. 2012; 46(6):3295-303. DOI: 10.1021/es2036702. View

2.
Schmidlin T, Hurlimann E, Silue K, Yapi R, Houngbedji C, Kouadio B . Effects of hygiene and defecation behavior on helminths and intestinal protozoa infections in Taabo, Côte d'Ivoire. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e65722. PMC: 3688730. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065722. View

3.
Ziegelbauer K, Speich B, Mausezahl D, Bos R, Keiser J, Utzinger J . Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012; 9(1):e1001162. PMC: 3265535. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001162. View

4.
Wolf J, Bonjour S, Pruss-Ustun A . An exploration of multilevel modeling for estimating access to drinking-water and sanitation. J Water Health. 2013; 11(1):64-77. DOI: 10.2166/wh.2012.107. View

5.
Brown M . Using Gini-style indices to evaluate the spatial patterns of health practitioners: theoretical considerations and an application based on Alberta data. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 38(9):1243-56. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90189-9. View