» Articles » PMID: 24714052

Preschoolers' Dot Enumeration Abilities Are Markers of Their Arithmetic Competence

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 10
PMID 24714052
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The abilities to enumerate small sets of items (e.g., dots) and to compare magnitudes are claimed to be indexes of core numerical competences that scaffold early math development. Insofar as this is correct, these abilities may be diagnostic markers of math competence in preschoolers. However, unlike magnitude comparison abilities, little research has examined preschoolers' ability to enumerate small sets, or its significance for emerging math abilities; which is surprising since dot enumeration is a marker of school-aged children's math competence. It is nevertheless possible that general cognitive functions (working memory, response inhibition in particular) are associated with preschoolers' math abilities and underlie nascent dot enumeration abilities. We investigated whether preschoolers' dot enumeration abilities predict their non-verbal arithmetic ability, over and above the influence of working memory and response inhibition. Two measures of dot enumeration ability were examined-inverse efficiency and paradigm specific (response time profiles) measures-to determine which has the better diagnostic utility as a marker of math competence. Seventy-eight 42-to-57 month-olds completed dot enumeration, working memory, response inhibition, and non-verbal addition and subtraction tasks. Dot enumeration efficiency predicted arithmetic ability over and above the influence of general cognitive functions. While dot enumeration efficiency was a better predictor of arithmetic ability than paradigm specific response time profiles; the response time profile displaying the smallest subitizing range and steepest subitizing slope, also displayed poor addition abilities, suggesting a weak subitizing profile may have diagnostic significance in preschoolers. Overall, the findings support the claim that dot enumeration abilities and general cognitive functions are markers of preschoolers' math ability.

Citing Articles

Form perception is a cognitive correlate of the relation between subitizing ability and math performance.

Cui Z, Hu Y, Wang X, Li C, Liu Z, Cui Z Cogn Process. 2024; 25(2):321-331.

PMID: 38421459 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01175-3.


Small number enumeration processes of deaf or hard-of-hearing students: A study using eye tracking and artificial intelligence.

Schindler M, Doderer J, Simon A, Schaffernicht E, Lilienthal A, Schafer K Front Psychol. 2022; 13:909775.

PMID: 36072043 PMC: 9441847. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.909775.


Media-multitasking and cognitive control across the lifespan.

Matthews N, Mattingley J, Dux P Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4349.

PMID: 35288584 PMC: 8919358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07777-1.


Relating mathematical abilities to numerical skills and executive functions in informal and formal schooling.

Wongupparaj P, Cohen Kadosh R BMC Psychol. 2022; 10(1):27.

PMID: 35148787 PMC: 8832645. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-00740-9.


Effect of Non-canonical Spatial Symmetry on Subitizing.

Hsin C, Lo Y, Tseng P Front Psychol. 2021; 12:562762.

PMID: 34393867 PMC: 8358310. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562762.


References
1.
Landerl K . Development of numerical processing in children with typical and dyscalculic arithmetic skills-a longitudinal study. Front Psychol. 2013; 4:459. PMC: 3720999. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00459. View

2.
Landerl K, Bevan A, Butterworth B . Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8-9-year-old students. Cognition. 2004; 93(2):99-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004. View

3.
Levine S, Jordan N, Huttenlocher J . Development of calculation abilities in young children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1992; 53(1):72-103. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-0965(05)80005-0. View

4.
Reeve R, Reynolds F, Humberstone J, Butterworth B . Stability and change in markers of core numerical competencies. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012; 141(4):649-66. DOI: 10.1037/a0027520. View

5.
Tuholski S, Engle R, Baylis G . Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Mem Cognit. 2001; 29(3):484-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196399. View