» Articles » PMID: 24709892

Electrical Brain Stimulation for Epilepsy

Overview
Journal Nat Rev Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Apr 9
PMID 24709892
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neurostimulation enables adjustable and reversible modulation of disease symptoms, including those of epilepsy. Two types of brain neuromodulation, comprising anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation at seizure foci, are supported by Class I evidence of effectiveness, and many other sites in the brain have been targeted in small trials of neurostimulation therapy for seizures. Animal studies have mainly assisted in the identification of potential neurostimulation sites and parameters, but much of the clinical work is only loosely based on fundamental principles derived from the laboratory, and the mechanisms by which brain neurostimulation reduces seizures remain poorly understood. The benefits of stimulation tend to increase over time, with maximal effect seen typically 1-2 years after implantation. Typical reductions of seizure frequency are approximately 40% acutely, and 50-69% after several years. Seizure intensity might also be reduced. Complications from brain neurostimulation are mainly associated with the implantation procedure and hardware, including stimulation-related paraesthesias, stimulation-site infections, electrode mistargeting and, in some patients, triggered seizures or even status epilepticus. Further preclinical and clinical experience with brain stimulation surgery should lead to improved outcomes by increasing our understanding of the optimal surgical candidates, sites and parameters.

Citing Articles

Medial pulvinar stimulation for focal drug-resistant epilepsy: interim 12-month results of the PULSE study.

Pizzo F, Carron R, Laguitton V, Clement A, Giusiano B, Bartolomei F Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1480819.

PMID: 39719976 PMC: 11667892. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1480819.


Predicting the effect of micro-stimulation on macaque prefrontal activity based on spontaneous circuit dynamics.

Nejatbakhsh A, Fumarola F, Esteki S, Toyoizumi T, Kiani R, Mazzucato L Phys Rev Res. 2024; 5(4).

PMID: 39669288 PMC: 11636805. DOI: 10.1103/physrevresearch.5.043211.


Why does invasive brain stimulation sometimes improve memory and sometimes impair it?.

Mohan U, Jacobs J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(10):e3002894.

PMID: 39453948 PMC: 11616832. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002894.


A deep brain stimulation-conditioned RF coil for 3T MRI.

Kutscha N, Mahmutovic M, Bhusal B, Vu J, Chemlali C, Hansen S Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(3):1411-1426.

PMID: 39444303 PMC: 11680727. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30331.


Nonlinear analysis of neuronal firing modulated by sinusoidal stimulation at axons in rat hippocampus.

Yuan Y, Ye X, Cui J, Zhang J, Wang Z Front Comput Neurosci. 2024; 18:1388224.

PMID: 39281981 PMC: 11392774. DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2024.1388224.


References
1.
Morrell M . Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011; 77(13):1295-304. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182302056. View

2.
Cooper I, Upton A . Therapeutic implications of modulation of metabolism and functional activity of cerebral cortex by chronic stimulation of cerebellum and thalamus. Biol Psychiatry. 1985; 20(7):811-3. DOI: 10.1016/0006-3223(85)90164-7. View

3.
Handforth A, DeSalles A, Krahl S . Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus as adjunct treatment for refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2006; 47(7):1239-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00563.x. View

4.
Fountas K, Smith J . A novel closed-loop stimulation system in the control of focal, medically refractory epilepsy. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007; 97(Pt 2):357-62. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_41. View

5.
Coley E, Farhadi R, Lewis S, Whittle I . The incidence of seizures following Deep Brain Stimulating electrode implantation for movement disorders, pain and psychiatric conditions. Br J Neurosurg. 2009; 23(2):179-83. DOI: 10.1080/02688690802673197. View