» Articles » PMID: 24708039

Anterior Maxillary Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Cephalometric Factors Involved in Upper Incisor Crown Exposure in Subjects with Class II and III Skeletal Open Bite

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Apr 9
PMID 24708039
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the anterior dentoalveolar and skeletal maxillary cephalometric factors involved in excessive upper incisor crown exposure (UICE) in subjects with skeletal open bite Class II (SOBCIIG) and Class III (SOBCIIIG) against an untreated control group (CG).

Materials And Methods: Seventy pretreatment lateral cephalograms of orthodontic young adult patients (34 men, 36 women) were examined. The sample was divided into three groups according to both sagittal and vertical growth pattern and occlusion. The CG group (n  =  25) included Class I, normodivergent cases with adequate overbite, and the SOBCIIG group (n  =  25) and SOBCIIIG group (n  =  20) included skeletal Class II or III malocclusions, respectively, with hyperdivergent pattern and negative overbite. Several cephalometric measurements were considered (skeletal and dental). Analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of covariance, and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were used. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for reducing the number of cephalometric variables related to UICE. Finally, a multiple linear regression was calculated.

Results: Significant differences in UICE were found between the groups (P < .05). UICE was 3.9 mm in SOBCIIG, 2.5 mm in SOBCIIIG, and 0.4 mm in CG. PCA showed that a nondental component-including vertical maxillary height (VMH) and upper lip height (ULH)-was the only component significantly associated with UICE. The regression model had a moderate prediction capability.

Conclusions: Although the UICE was statistically different in SOBCIIG, the values were within the esthetic standards. The UICE was mainly influenced by VMH and ULH.

Citing Articles

Effects of Occlusal Contact on Maxillary Alveolar Bone Morphology in Patients with and without Anterior Open Bite: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Shimizu-Tomoda C, Ishida Y, Ishizaki-Terauchi A, Mizoguchi Y, Oishi S, Ono T J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892772 PMC: 11173162. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113061.


Incisor and Soft Tissue Characteristics of Adult Bimaxillary Protrusion Patients among Different Skeletal Anteroposterior Classifications.

Siangloy T, Charoemratrote C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 38786330 PMC: 11119585. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101031.


Three-Dimensional Analysis of Alveolar Bone Morphological Characteristics in Skeletal Class II Open Bite Malocclusion: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Tang Y, Xu J, Hu Y, Huang Y, Liu Y, Daraqel B Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(1).

PMID: 36611329 PMC: 9818805. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010039.


Incisor root length in individuals with and without anterior open bite: a comparative CBCT study.

Arriola-Guillen L, Valera-Montoya I, Rodriguez-Cardenas Y, Ruiz-Mora G, Castillo A, Janson G Dental Press J Orthod. 2020; 25(4):23e1-23e7.

PMID: 32965383 PMC: 7510492. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.4.23.e1-7.onl.


Relationship between the Condylion-Gonion-Menton Angle and Dentoalveolar Heights.

Valletta R, Rongo R, Pango Madariaga A, Baiano R, Spagnuolo G, DAnto V Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(9).

PMID: 32397490 PMC: 7246519. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17093309.


References
1.
Hunt O, Johnston C, Hepper P, Burden D, Stevenson M . The influence of maxillary gingival exposure on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod. 2002; 24(2):199-204. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/24.2.199. View

2.
Ribeiro G, Regis Jr S, Cunha T, Sabatoski M, Guariza-Filho O, Tanaka O . Multiloop edgewise archwire in the treatment of a patient with an anterior open bite and a long face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138(1):89-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.036. View

3.
Kuitert R, Beckmann S, van Loenen M, Tuinzing B, Zentner A . Dentoalveolar compensation in subjects with vertical skeletal dysplasia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(5):649-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.032. View

4.
Proffit W, Turvey T, Phillips C . Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1996; 11(3):191-204. View

5.
Garber D, Salama M . The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 1996; 11:18-28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00179.x. View