» Articles » PMID: 24707966

Diagnostic Thresholds with Three Ordinal Groups

Overview
Journal J Biopharm Stat
Date 2014 Apr 9
PMID 24707966
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In practice, there exist many disease processes with three ordinal disease classes; for example, in the detection of Alzheimer's disease (AD) a patient can be classified as healthy (disease-free stage), mild cognitive impairment (early disease stage), or AD (full disease stage). The treatment interventions and effectiveness of such disease processes will depend on the disease stage. Therefore, it is important to develop diagnostic tests with the ability to discriminate between the three disease stages. Measuring the overall ability of diagnostic tests to discriminate between the three classes has been discussed extensively in the literature. However, there has been little proposed on how to select clinically meaningful thresholds for such diagnostic tests, except for a method based on the generalized Youden index by Nakas et al. (2010). In this article, we propose two new criteria for selecting diagnostic thresholds in the three-class setting. The numerical study demonstrated that the proposed methods may provide thresholds with less variability and more balance among the correct classification rates for the three stages. The proposed methods are applied to two real examples: the clinical diagnosis of AD from the Washington University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and the detection of liver cancer (LC) using protein segments.

Citing Articles

Combining multiple biomarkers linearly to minimize the Euclidean distance of the closest point on the receiver operating characteristic surface to the perfection corner in trichotomous settings.

Mosier B, Bantis L Stat Methods Med Res. 2024; 33(4):647-668.

PMID: 38445348 PMC: 11234871. DOI: 10.1177/09622802241233768.


On diagnostic accuracy measure with cut-points criterion for ordinal disease classification based on concordance and discordance.

Kersey J, Samawi H, Yin J, Rochani H, Zhang X J Appl Stat. 2023; 50(8):1772-1789.

PMID: 37260473 PMC: 10228310. DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2022.2041567.


A network approach to compute hypervolume under receiver operating characteristic manifold for multi-class biomarkers.

Feng Q, Liu P, Kuan P, Zou F, Chen J, Li J Stat Med. 2023; .

PMID: 36597213 PMC: 10478792. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9646.


Construction of joint confidence spaces for the optimal true class fraction triplet in the ROC space using alternative biomarker cutoffs.

Shi P, Bantis L Biom J. 2022; 64(6):1023-1039.

PMID: 35561036 PMC: 9642830. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.202100132.


On optimal biomarker cutoffs accounting for misclassification costs in diagnostic trilemmas with applications to pancreatic cancer.

Bantis L, Tsimikas J Stat Med. 2022; 41(18):3527-3546.

PMID: 35543227 PMC: 9707502. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9432.


References
1.
Youden W . Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950; 3(1):32-5. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(1950)3:1<32::aid-cncr2820030106>3.0.co;2-3. View

2.
Zhang D, Freeman Jr D, Freeman J . A non-parametric method for the comparison of partial areas under ROC curves and its application to large health care data sets. Stat Med. 2002; 21(5):701-15. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1011. View

3.
Kang L, Xiong C, Crane P, Tian L . Linear combinations of biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories. Stat Med. 2012; 32(4):631-43. PMC: 4351049. DOI: 10.1002/sim.5542. View

4.
COFFIN M, Sukhatme S . Receiver operating characteristic studies and measurement errors. Biometrics. 1997; 53(3):823-37. View

5.
Mossman D . Three-way ROCs. Med Decis Making. 1999; 19(1):78-89. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900110. View