DFT Study of the Mechanism of the Reaction of Aminoguanidine with Methylglyoxal
Overview
Affiliations
We have studied the mechanism of the reaction between aminoguanidine (AG) and methylglyoxal (MG) by carrying out Dmol3/DFT calculations, obtaining intermediates, transition-state structures, and free-energy profiles for all of the elementary steps of the reaction. Designed models included explicit water solvent, which forms hydrogen-bond networks around the reactants and intermediate molecules, facilitating intramolecular proton transfer in some steps of the reaction mechanism. The reaction take place in four steps, namely: (1) formation of a guanylhydrazone-acetylcarbinol adduct by condensation of AG and MG; (2) dehydration of the adduct; (3) formation of an 1,2,4-triazine derivative by ring closure; and (4) dehydration with the formation of 5-methyl 3-amino-1,2,4-triazine as the final product. From a microkinetic point of view, the first dehydration step was found to be the rate-determining step for the reaction, with the reaction having an apparent activation energy of 12.65 kcal mol⁻¹. Additionally, some analogous structures of intermediates and transition states for the reaction between AG and 2,3-dicarbonyl-phosphatidylethanolamine, a possible intermediate in Amadori-glycated phosphatidylethanolamine (Amadori-PE) autooxidation, were obtained to evaluate the reaction above a phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) surface. Our results are in agreement with experimental results obtaining by other authors, showing that AG is efficient at trapping dicarbonyl compounds such as methylglyoxal, and by extension these compounds joined to biomolecules such as PE in environments such as surfaces and their aqueous surroundings.
Methylglyoxal and Its Adducts: Induction, Repair, and Association with Disease.
Lai S, Lopez Gonzalez E, Zoukari T, Ki P, Shuck S Chem Res Toxicol. 2022; 35(10):1720-1746.
PMID: 36197742 PMC: 9580021. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.2c00160.
Monitoring of methylglyoxal/indole interaction by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and qTOF/MS/MS analysis.
Ghassem Zadeh R, Yaylayan V Curr Res Food Sci. 2020; 3:67-72.
PMID: 32914122 PMC: 7473333. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.003.
Garcia-Diez G, Ramis R, Mora-Diez N ACS Omega. 2020; 5(24):14502-14512.
PMID: 32596588 PMC: 7315568. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01175.
Richardson M, Furlani R, Podell B, Ackart D, Haugen J, Melander R Tetrahedron Lett. 2015; 56(23):3406-3409.
PMID: 26146419 PMC: 4487526. DOI: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.01.122.
Solis-Calero C, Ortega-Castro J, Frau J, Munoz F Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015; 2015:319505.
PMID: 25977746 PMC: 4419266. DOI: 10.1155/2015/319505.