» Articles » PMID: 24705646

Factors Related to Prevalence of Hallux Valgus in Female University Students: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Apr 8
PMID 24705646
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We investigated the prevalence of hallux valgus (HV) and examined its association with various factors in a cross-sectional study of Japanese female university students.

Methods: A questionnaire survey of foot symptoms, lifestyle, and body mass index (BMI) was administered to 343 women who provided informed consent at a women's university. Footprints were obtained and bone density was measured. Associations of HV with various factors were analyzed by logistic regression analysis.

Results: Big toe pain was reported in 26.5% of the women. HV (HV angle, ≥15°) was present in the left foot in 22.4%, the right foot in 20.7%, and unilaterally or bilaterally in 29.7% of women. Mild HV (HV angle, ≥15° to <20°) was noted in the left foot and right foot in 13.4% and 13.1% of women, respectively; no severe HV (HV angle, ≥40°) was observed. HV was associated with big toe pain (adjusted OR: 3.56, 95% CI: 2.01-6.32), history of HV in the mother or maternal grandmother (adjusted OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.19-5.02), and history of HV in other family members (adjusted OR: 3.09, 95% CI: 1.35-7.06). Moderate HV was associated with big toe pain (adjusted OR: 4.58, 95% CI: 2.17-9.66) and history of HV in the mother or maternal grandmother (adjusted OR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.40-8.07). The proportion of women with big toe pain increased significantly with HV severity.

Conclusions: HV was present in about 30% of female university students. Young women with big toe pain or a family history of HV should be evaluated for HV.

Citing Articles

Characteristics of hindfoot morphology and ankle range of motion in young women with hallux valgus.

Yokozuka M, Okazaki K J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):64.

PMID: 37749634 PMC: 10519086. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00666-4.


Global prevalence and incidence of hallux valgus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cai Y, Song Y, He M, He W, Zhong X, Wen H J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):63.

PMID: 37726760 PMC: 10510234. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00661-9.


Evaluation of the relationship between hallux valgus and foot measurements in radiographic images of adult female.

Acikgoz A, Mutluay S, Binokay F, Bozkir M Surg Radiol Anat. 2022; 44(9):1281-1288.

PMID: 36076036 DOI: 10.1007/s00276-022-03012-8.


Analysis of skeletal characteristics of flat feet using three-dimensional foot scanner and digital footprint.

Yamashita T, Yamashita K, Sato M, Kawasumi M, Ata S Biomed Eng Online. 2022; 21(1):56.

PMID: 35945533 PMC: 9361570. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-022-01021-7.


Relationship Between Demographic and Radiographic Characteristics and Second Ray Pathology in Hallux Valgus Patients.

Cronin S, Conti M, Williams N, Ellis S Foot Ankle Orthop. 2022; 5(1):2473011420909088.

PMID: 35097369 PMC: 8697280. DOI: 10.1177/2473011420909088.


References
1.
Nix S, Smith M, Vicenzino B . Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3:21. PMC: 2955707. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-21. View

2.
DArcangelo P, Landorf K, Munteanu S, Zammit G, Menz H . Radiographic correlates of hallux valgus severity in older people. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010; 3:20. PMC: 2949715. DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-3-20. View

3.
HARDY R, CLAPHAM J . Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951; 33-B(3):376-91. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.33B3.376. View

4.
STAHELI L, Chew D, Corbett M . The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69(3):426-8. View

5.
Garrow A, Papageorgiou A, Silman A, Thomas E, Jayson M, Macfarlane G . The grading of hallux valgus. The Manchester Scale. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2001; 91(2):74-8. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-91-2-74. View