» Articles » PMID: 24705611

Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure to Manage Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the U.K

Overview
Journal Diabetes Care
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2014 Apr 8
PMID 24705611
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to manage obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the perspective of the U.K.'s National Health Service (NHS).

Research Design And Methods: Using a case-control design, 150 CPAP-treated patients with OSA and T2D were randomly selected from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database (a nationally representative database of patients registered with general practitioners in the U.K.) and matched with 150 OSA and T2D patients from the same database who were not treated with CPAP. The total NHS cost and outcomes of patient management in both groups over 5 years and the cost-effectiveness of CPAP compared with no CPAP treatment were estimated.

Results: Using CPAP was associated with significantly lower blood pressure at 5 years and increasingly lower HbA1c levels over 5 consecutive years compared with untreated OSA patients. At 5 years, the HbA1c level in the CPAP-treated group was 8.2% (66.0 mmol/mol) vs. 12.1% (108.4 mmol/mol) in the control group (P < 0.03). Use of CPAP significantly increased patients' health status by 0.27 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient over 5 years (P < 0.001) and NHS management costs by £4,141 per patient over 5 years; the cost per QALY gained with CPAP was £15,337.

Conclusions: Initiating treatment with CPAP in OSA patients with T2D leads to significantly lower blood pressure and better controlled diabetes and affords a cost-effective use of NHS resources. These observations have the potential for treatment modification if confirmed in a prospective study.

Citing Articles

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Versus Positive Airway Pressure in Patient With Obstructive Sleep Apnea in South Korea.

Cho J J Rhinol. 2024; 30(1):15-22.

PMID: 39664700 PMC: 11524363. DOI: 10.18787/jr.2022.00416.


The Role of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Metabolic Syndrome: Does It Affect the Outcomes?.

Choudhary S, Khedkar C, Aurangabadkar G, Khan S, Nayse J Cureus. 2024; 16(4):e57807.

PMID: 38721156 PMC: 11077466. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57807.


Content Comparison of Quality-of-Life Instruments Used in Economic Evaluations of Sleep Disorder Interventions: A Systematic Review.

Kaambwa B, Woods T, Natsky A, Bulamu N, Mpundu-Kaambwa C, Loffler K Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(5):507-526.

PMID: 38340220 PMC: 11039546. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01349-5.


The Burden of Comorbidities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and the Pathophysiologic Mechanisms and Effects of CPAP.

Sircu V, Colesnic S, Covantsev S, Corlateanu O, Sukhotko A, Popovici C Clocks Sleep. 2023; 5(2):333-349.

PMID: 37366660 PMC: 10297352. DOI: 10.3390/clockssleep5020025.


Association between positive airway pressure therapy adherence and health care resource utilization in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and type 2 diabetes in the United States.

Sterling K, Cistulli P, Linde-Zwirble W, Malik A, Benjafield A, Malhotra A J Clin Sleep Med. 2022; 19(3):563-571.

PMID: 36546368 PMC: 9978433. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10388.