» Articles » PMID: 24701197

Examining Variations in Fourth-grade Children's Participation in School-breakfast and School-lunch Programs by Student and Program Demographics

Overview
Date 2014 Apr 5
PMID 24701197
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose/objectives: Analyses were conducted to examine variations in fourth-grade children's participation in school-breakfast and school-lunch programs by weekday, month, socioeconomic status, absenteeism, sex, and school-breakfast location.

Methods: Fourth-grade children were participants in a dietary-reporting validation study during the 2005-2006 or 2006-2007 school years in 17 or 8 schools, respectively, in one South Carolina school district. For the two respective school years, school-breakfast location was the classroom for six and seven schools, and for the remaining schools, the cafeteria. District administrative records provided information about 180 possible days of participation in the school-breakfast and school-lunch programs for each of 1,060 children (91% Black, 52% girls). The state's Office of Research and Statistics linked data on school-meal participation with information about individual children's socioeconomic status (eligibility for free or reduced-price school meals) and annual absenteeism from school.

Results: For school-provided breakfast, logistic regression showed participation rate differences by weekday (smallest for Monday [56.1%], largest for Wednesday [57.8%], p<0.0001), month (smallest for April [53.5%], largest for September [60.8%], p<0.0001), socioeconomic status (smallest for full-price status [27.5%], largest for free-meal status [63.4%], p<0.0001), school-breakfast location (smaller for breakfast located in the cafeteria [38%] than classroom [71%], p<0.0001), and absenteeism (p<0.0001). For school-provided lunch, logistic regression showed participation rate differences by weekday (smallest for Friday [81.9%], largest for Thursday [83.3%], p<0.0001), month (smallest for May [78.7%], largest for August [86.0%], p<0.0001), socioeconomic status (smallest for full-price status [72.1%], largest for free-meal status [84.9%], p<0.0001), and absenteeism (p<0.0001). There were no differences in participation rate by sex.

Applications For Child Nutrition Professionals: Administrative participation records are used for forecasting purchasing and production. Using such records in research studies may provide insight into aspects of children's participation in school-provided meals. Districts and managers are encouraged to share administrative records of children's participation in school-provided meals with researchers.

Citing Articles

Experiences participating in federal nutrition assistance programs during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic: an investigation in Vermont.

Spence E, Niles M, Bertmann F, Belarmino E Nutr J. 2024; 23(1):74.

PMID: 39004722 PMC: 11247766. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-024-00963-z.


Alternative School Breakfast Service Models and Associations with Breakfast Participation, Diet Quality, Body Mass Index, Attendance, Behavior, and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review.

Olarte D, Tsai M, Chapman L, Hager E, Cohen J Nutrients. 2023; 15(13).

PMID: 37447277 PMC: 10346933. DOI: 10.3390/nu15132951.


The Role of District Wellness Policies in Encouraging Student Participation in the School Breakfast Program, United States.

Leider J, Lin W, Piekarz-Porter E, Turner L, Chriqui J Nutrients. 2020; 12(8).

PMID: 32717935 PMC: 7469058. DOI: 10.3390/nu12082187.


Identifying gaps in the food security safety net: the characteristics and availability of summer nutrition programmes in California, USA.

Turner L, OReilly N, Ralston K, Guthrie J Public Health Nutr. 2019; 22(10):1824-1838.

PMID: 30774048 PMC: 10260660. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018004135.

References
1.
Baxter S, Hardin J, Guinn C, Royer J, Mackelprang A, Devlin C . Children's body mass index, participation in school meals, and observed energy intake at school meals. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7:24. PMC: 2859739. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-24. View

2.
Guinn C, Baxter S, Thompson W, Frye F, Kopec C . Which fourth-grade children participate in school breakfast and do their parents know it?. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002; 34(3):159-65. PMC: 1463216. DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60085-7. View

3.
Crepinsek M, Singh A, Bernstein L, McLaughlin J . Dietary effects of universal-free school breakfast: findings from the evaluation of the school breakfast program pilot project. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(11):1796-803. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.08.013. View

4.
Gleason P, Dodd A . School breakfast program but not school lunch program participation is associated with lower body mass index. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(2 Suppl):S118-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.058. View

5.
Vaisman N, Voet H, Akivis A, Vakil E . Effect of breakfast timing on the cognitive functions of elementary school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996; 150(10):1089-92. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170350091016. View