» Articles » PMID: 24699851

Functional Outcomes and Return to Sports After Acute Repair, Chronic Repair, and Allograft Reconstruction for Proximal Hamstring Ruptures

Overview
Journal Am J Sports Med
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Apr 5
PMID 24699851
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There are limited data regarding outcomes and return to sports after surgery for acute versus chronic proximal hamstring ruptures.

Hypothesis: Surgery for chronic proximal hamstring ruptures leads to improved outcomes and return to sports but at a lower level than with acute repair. Proximal hamstring reconstruction with an Achilles allograft for chronic ruptures is successful when direct repair is not possible.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: Between 2002 and 2012, a total of 72 patients with a traumatic proximal hamstring rupture (51 acute, 21 chronic) underwent either direct tendon repair with suture anchors (n = 58) or Achilles allograft tendon reconstruction (n = 14). Results from the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) for activities of daily living (ADL) and sports-related activities, Short Form-12 (SF-12), visual analog scale (VAS), and a patient satisfaction questionnaire were obtained.

Results: The mean time to surgery in the chronic group was 441.4 days versus 17.8 days in the acute group. At a mean follow-up of 45 months, patients with chronic tears had inferior sports activity scores (70.2% vs 80.3%, respectively; P = .026) and a trend for decreased ADL scores (86.5% vs 93.3%, respectively; P = .085) compared with those with acute tears. Patients with chronic tears, however, reported significant improvements postoperatively for both sports activity scores (30.3% to 70.2%; P < .01) and ADL scores (56.1% to 86.5%; P < .01). Greater than 5 to 6 cm of retraction in the chronic group was predictive of the need for allograft reconstruction (P = .015) and resulted in ADL and sports activity scores equal to those of chronic repair (P = .507 and P = .904, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in SF-12, VAS, or patient satisfaction outcomes (mean, 85.2% satisfaction overall).

Conclusion: Acute repair was superior to chronic surgery with regard to return to sports. Acute and chronic proximal hamstring repair and allograft reconstruction had favorable results for ADL. For low-demand patients or those with medical comorbidities, delayed repair or reconstruction might be considered with an expected 87% return to normal ADL. For patients who desire to return to sports, acute repair is recommended.

Citing Articles

Proximal Hamstring Avulsions: Surgical Versus Conservative Treatment Using a Shared Decision-Making Strategy.

Spoorendonk K, Bohn M, Storm J, Lund B, Kierkegaard-Brochner S Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(10):23259671241275656.

PMID: 39440155 PMC: 11494528. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241275656.


Risk Factors for Rerupture After Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Injury Including the Optimal Timing for Surgery.

Lefevre N, Freiha K, Moussa M, Valentin E, Bohu Y, Meyer A Am J Sports Med. 2024; 52(5):1173-1182.

PMID: 38482843 PMC: 10986149. DOI: 10.1177/03635465241233734.


Assessment of fatty infiltration of the hamstring muscles in chronic proximal hamstring ruptures and effect on clinical outcomes after surgical repair: a novel application of the Goutallier classification.

Li Z, Buldo-Licciardi M, Moore M, Kanakamedala A, Burke C, Samim M Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(5):2171-2179.

PMID: 38480556 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05255-z.


Systematic Review of Bracing After Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Wyatt P, Ho T, Hopper H, Satalich J, ONeill C, Cyrus J Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(2):23259671241230045.

PMID: 38405008 PMC: 10894551. DOI: 10.1177/23259671241230045.


Proximal Hamstring Repair With All-Suture Anchors and an Accelerated Rehabilitation and Bracing Protocol Demonstrates Good Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-Up.

Wong S, Julian K, Carpio J, Zhang A Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024; 6(2):100891.

PMID: 38362482 PMC: 10867423. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100891.