» Articles » PMID: 24697251

Elucidating the Clinical Characteristics of Patients Captured Using Different Definitions of Massive Transfusion

Overview
Journal Vox Sang
Specialty Hematology
Date 2014 Apr 5
PMID 24697251
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: The type and clinical characteristics of patients identified with commonly used definitions of massive transfusion (MT) are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to define the clinical characteristics of patients meeting different definitions of MT for the purpose of patient recruitment in observational studies.

Materials And Methods: Data were extracted on all patients who received red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in 2010 at three tertiary Australian hospitals. MT patients were identified according to three definitions: ≥10 units RBC in 24 h (10/24 h), ≥6 units RBC in 6 h (6/6 h) and ≥5 units RBC in 4 h (5/4 h). Clinical coding data were used to assign bleeding context. Data on in-hospital mortality were also extracted.

Results: Five hundred and forty-two patients met at least one MT definition, with 236 (44%) included by all definitions. The most inclusive definition was 5/4 h (508 patients, 94%) followed by 6/6 h (455 patients, 84%) and 10/24 h (251 patients, 46%). Importantly, 40-55% of most types of critical bleeding events and 82% of all obstetric haemorrhage cases were excluded by the 10/24 h definition. Patients who met both the 5/4 h and 10/24 h definitions were transfused more RBCs (19 vs. 8 median total RBC units; P < 0·001), had longer ventilation time (120 vs. 55 h; P < 0·001), median ICU (149 vs. 99 h; P < 0·001) and hospital length of stay (23 vs. 18 h; P = 0·006) and had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (23·3% vs. 16·4%; P = 0·050).

Conclusion: The 5/4 h MT definition was the most inclusive, but combination with the 10/24 h definition appeared to identify a clinically important patient cohort.

Citing Articles

Major Bleeding in the Emergency Department: A Practical Guide for Optimal Management.

Bezati S, Ventoulis I, Verras C, Boultadakis A, Bistola V, Sbyrakis N J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941455 PMC: 11818891. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030784.


Whipple's procedure for pancreatic cancer: training and the hospital environment are more important than volume alone.

Cawich S, Cabral R, Douglas J, Thomas D, Mohammed F, Naraynsingh V Surg Pract Sci. 2025; 14():100211.

PMID: 39845848 PMC: 11749909. DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100211.


Is pre-hospital haemoglobin an efficient marker of the need for transfusion and haemorrhagic shock in severe trauma patients? A retrospective observational study.

Mathais Q, Dufour M, De Malleray H, Bonnefoy M, Bruno L, Meaudres E Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):11.

PMID: 39804417 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02679-5.


Comparison of the lethal triad and the lethal diamond in severe trauma patients: a multicenter cohort.

Dupuy C, Martinez T, Duranteau O, Gauss T, Kapandji N, Pasqueron J World J Emerg Surg. 2025; 20(1):2.

PMID: 39773274 PMC: 11705660. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00572-5.


Markers of Futile Resuscitation in Traumatic Hemorrhage: A Review of the Evidence and a Proposal for Futility Time-Outs during Massive Transfusion.

Walsh M, Fox M, Moore E, Johnson J, Bunch C, Miller J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200824 PMC: 11355875. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164684.