» Articles » PMID: 24695637

Nest Grouping Patterns of Bonobos (Pan Paniscus) in Relation to Fruit Availability in a Forest-savannah Mosaic

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 4
PMID 24695637
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A topic of major interest in socio-ecology is the comparison of chimpanzees and bonobos' grouping patterns. Numerous studies have highlighted the impact of social and environmental factors on the different evolution in group cohesion seen in these sister species. We are still lacking, however, key information about bonobo social traits across their habitat range, in order to make accurate inter-species comparisons. In this study we investigated bonobo social cohesiveness at nesting sites depending on fruit availability in the forest-savannah mosaic of western Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a bonobo habitat which has received little attention from researchers and is characterized by high food resource variation within years. We collected data on two bonobo communities. Nest counts at nesting sites were used as a proxy for night grouping patterns and were analysed with regard to fruit availability. We also modelled bonobo population density at the site in order to investigate yearly variation. We found that one community density varied across the three years of surveys, suggesting that this bonobo community has significant variability in use of its home range. This finding highlights the importance of forest connectivity, a likely prerequisite for the ability of bonobos to adapt their ranging patterns to fruit availability changes. We found no influence of overall fruit availability on bonobo cohesiveness. Only fruit availability at the nesting sites showed a positive influence, indicating that bonobos favour food 'hot spots' as sleeping sites. Our findings have confirmed the results obtained from previous studies carried out in the dense tropical forests of DRC. Nevertheless, in order to clarify the impact of environmental variability on bonobo social cohesiveness, we will need to make direct observations of the apes in the forest-savannah mosaic as well as make comparisons across the entirety of the bonobos' range using systematic methodology.

Citing Articles

CoFee-L: A Model of Animal Displacement in Large Groups Combining Cohesion Maintenance, Feeding Area Search and Transient Leadership.

Gavrilitchenko N, Gazagne E, Vandewalle N, Delcourt J, Hambuckers A Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(18).

PMID: 36139272 PMC: 9495015. DOI: 10.3390/ani12182412.


No time to rest: How the effects of climate change on nest decay threaten the conservation of apes in the wild.

Bessone M, Booto L, Santos A, Kuhl H, Fruth B PLoS One. 2021; 16(6):e0252527.

PMID: 34191810 PMC: 8244864. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252527.


Assessment of in situ nest decay rate for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes ellioti Matschie, 1914) in Mbam-Djerem National Park, Cameroon: implications for long-term monitoring.

Kamgang S, Carme T, Bobo K, Abwe E, Gonder M, Sinsin B Primates. 2019; 61(2):189-200.

PMID: 31659555 PMC: 7080673. DOI: 10.1007/s10329-019-00768-3.


Wood Specific Gravity Variations and Biomass of Central African Tree Species: The Simple Choice of the Outer Wood.

Bastin J, Fayolle A, Tarelkin Y, Van den Bulcke J, de Haulleville T, Mortier F PLoS One. 2015; 10(11):e0142146.

PMID: 26555144 PMC: 4640573. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142146.


Feeding ecology of bonobos living in forest-savannah mosaics: Diet seasonal variation and importance of fallback foods.

Serckx A, Kuhl H, Beudels-Jamar R, Poncin P, Bastin J, Huynen M Am J Primatol. 2015; 77(9):948-962.

PMID: 25974229 PMC: 7159761. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22425.

References
1.
Kouakou C, Boesch C, Kuehl H . Estimating chimpanzee population size with nest counts: validating methods in Taï National Park. Am J Primatol. 2009; 71(6):447-57. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20673. View

2.
Mulavwa M, Yangozene K, Yamba-Yamba M, Motema-Salo B, Mwanza N, Furuichi T . Nest groups of wild bonobos at Wamba: selection of vegetation and tree species and relationships between nest group size and party size. Am J Primatol. 2010; 72(7):575-86. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20810. View

3.
Malenky R, Wrangham R . A quantitative comparison of terrestrial herbaceous food consumption by Pan paniscus in the Lomako Forest, Zaire, and Pan troglodytes in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. Am J Primatol. 2020; 32(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1002/ajp.1350320102. View

4.
Kawamoto Y, Takemoto H, Higuchi S, Sakamaki T, Hart J, Hart T . Genetic structure of wild bonobo populations: diversity of mitochondrial DNA and geographical distribution. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59660. PMC: 3609822. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059660. View

5.
Thomas L, Buckland S, Rexstad E, Laake J, Strindberg S, Hedley S . Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J Appl Ecol. 2010; 47(1):5-14. PMC: 2847204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x. View