» Articles » PMID: 24695429

The Effect of Fast and Slow Motor Unit Activation on Whole-muscle Mechanical Performance: the Size Principle May Not Pose a Mechanical Paradox

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2014 Apr 4
PMID 24695429
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The output of skeletal muscle can be varied by selectively recruiting different motor units. However, our knowledge of muscle function is largely derived from muscle in which all motor units are activated. This discrepancy may limit our understanding of in vivo muscle function. Hence, this study aimed to characterize the mechanical properties of muscle with different motor unit activation. We determined the isometric properties and isotonic force-velocity relationship of rat plantaris muscles in situ with all of the muscle active, 30% of the muscle containing predominately slower motor units active or 20% of the muscle containing predominately faster motor units active. There was a significant effect of active motor unit type on isometric force rise time (p < 0.001) and the force-velocity relationship (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, force rise time was longer and maximum shortening velocity higher when all motor units were active than when either fast or slow motor units were selectively activated. We propose this is due to the greater relative effects of factors such as series compliance and muscle resistance to shortening during sub-maximal contractions. The findings presented here suggest that recruitment according to the size principle, where slow motor units are activated first and faster ones recruited as demand increases, may not pose a mechanical paradox, as has been previously suggested.

Citing Articles

Does the unusual phenomenon of sustained force circumvent the speed-endurance trade-off in the jaw muscle of the southern alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata)?.

Nguyen A, Leong K, Holt N J Exp Biol. 2024; 228(2).

PMID: 39690956 PMC: 11832124. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.247979.


Linking in vivo muscle dynamics to force-length and force-velocity properties reveals that guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius operates at shorter than optimal lengths.

Schwaner M, Mayfield D, Azizi E, Daley M J Exp Biol. 2024; 227(15).

PMID: 38873800 PMC: 11418180. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246879.


Linking muscle dynamics to force-length and force-velocity reveals that guinea fowl lateral gastrocnemius operates at shorter than optimal lengths.

Schwaner M, Mayfield D, Azizi E, Daley M bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37905058 PMC: 10614737. DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.11.561922.


The effects of crank power and cadence on muscle fascicle shortening velocity, muscle activation and joint-specific power during cycling.

Riveros-Matthey C, Carroll T, Lichtwark G, Connick M J Exp Biol. 2023; 226(13).

PMID: 37326292 PMC: 10357033. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.245600.


A theory of physiological similarity in muscle-driven motion.

Labonte D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(24):e2221217120.

PMID: 37285395 PMC: 10268211. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221217120.


References
1.
Close R . DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF FAST AND SLOW SKELETAL MUSCLES OF THE RAT DURING DEVELOPMENT. J Physiol. 1964; 173:74-95. PMC: 1368881. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007444. View

2.
Bottinelli R, Schiaffino S, Reggiani C . Force-velocity relations and myosin heavy chain isoform compositions of skinned fibres from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1991; 437:655-72. PMC: 1180069. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018617. View

3.
Hoffer J, Loeb G, Marks W, ODonovan M, Pratt C, Sugano N . Cat hindlimb motoneurons during locomotion. I. Destination, axonal conduction velocity, and recruitment threshold. J Neurophysiol. 1987; 57(2):510-29. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1987.57.2.510. View

4.
Caiozzo V, Herrick R, Baldwin K . Response of slow and fast muscle to hypothyroidism: maximal shortening velocity and myosin isoforms. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263(1 Pt 1):C86-94. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.1.C86. View

5.
Hodson-Tole E, Wakeling J . Motor unit recruitment patterns 2: the influence of myoelectric intensity and muscle fascicle strain rate. J Exp Biol. 2008; 211(Pt 12):1893-902. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.014415. View