» Articles » PMID: 24692164

Pain Anticipation Recruits the Mesolimbic System and Differentially Modulates Subsequent Recognition Memory

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Apr 3
PMID 24692164
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to encode information into long-term memory is not a passive process but can be influenced by motivational factors. While the mesolimbic system has long been associated with reward-driven memory enhancement, the precise neurobiology of processing aversive events and their effects on declarative learning remain unclear. To address this issue, human subjects encoded a series of scene images, which was combined with cues predicting an aversive electric shock with different probabilities (0.2, 0.5, 0.8). Subsequently, recognition memory for the scenes was tested using a remember/know procedure. In a behavioral experiment, shock probability had linear effects on familiarity and inverted u-shaped effects on recollection. While the behavioral effect was absent in experiment 2 (fMRI), at the neural level encoding-related activity in the hippocampus mimicked the recollection specific quadratic effect, whereas activity in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus mirrored the familiarity specific linear relationship that was evident in experiment 1. Importantly, the probability of upcoming shocks was linearly coded in the substantia nigra / ventral tegmental area, and pain associated brain regions, such as the insula, responded to shock delivery. Our results demonstrate that anticipating primary aversive events recruits the human mesolimbic system and differentially modulates declarative memory functions via medial temporal lobe structures.

Citing Articles

Emotional intensity produces a linear relationship on conditioned learning but an inverted U-shaped effect on episodic memory.

Ouyang L, Dunsmoor J Learn Mem. 2024; 31(12).

PMID: 39681457 PMC: 11662143. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053982.124.


The effects of experimental pain on episodic memory and its top-down modulation: a preregistered pooled analysis.

Kaur J, Bingel U, Kincses B, Forkmann K, Schmidt K Pain Rep. 2024; 9(5):e1178.

PMID: 39131813 PMC: 11311657. DOI: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001178.


Structural and Functional Brain Changes in Patients With Classic Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Combination of Voxel-Based Morphometry and Resting-State Functional MRI Study.

Liu H, Hou H, Li F, Zheng R, Zhang Y, Cheng J Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:930765.

PMID: 35844235 PMC: 9277055. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.930765.


Memory consolidation as an adaptive process.

Cowan E, Schapiro A, Dunsmoor J, Murty V Psychon Bull Rev. 2021; 28(6):1796-1810.

PMID: 34327677 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01978-x.


Memory for non-painful auditory items is influenced by whether they are experienced in a context involving painful electrical stimulation.

Vogt K, Norton C, Speer L, Tremel J, Ibinson J, Reder L Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(7):1615-1627.

PMID: 30941440 PMC: 6586482. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05534-x.


References
1.
Haber S, Knutson B . The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 35(1):4-26. PMC: 3055449. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.129. View

2.
Eccleston C, Crombez G . Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychol Bull. 1999; 125(3):356-66. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.356. View

3.
Bromberg-Martin E, Matsumoto M, Hikosaka O . Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron. 2010; 68(5):815-34. PMC: 3032992. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.022. View

4.
Bunzeck N, Doeller C, Dolan R, Duzel E . Contextual interaction between novelty and reward processing within the mesolimbic system. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011; 33(6):1309-24. PMC: 3498733. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21288. View

5.
Lammel S, Lim B, Malenka R . Reward and aversion in a heterogeneous midbrain dopamine system. Neuropharmacology. 2013; 76 Pt B:351-9. PMC: 3778102. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.03.019. View