» Articles » PMID: 24682186

Validity of Myocardial Infarction Diagnoses in Administrative Databases: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 1
PMID 24682186
Citations 130
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Though administrative databases are increasingly being used for research related to myocardial infarction (MI), the validity of MI diagnoses in these databases has never been synthesized on a large scale.

Objective: To conduct the first systematic review of studies reporting on the validity of diagnostic codes for identifying MI in administrative data.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched (inception to November 2010) for studies: (a) Using administrative data to identify MI; or (b) Evaluating the validity of MI codes in administrative data; and (c) Reporting validation statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, or Kappa scores) for MI, or data sufficient for their calculation. Additonal articles were located by handsearch (up to February 2011) of original papers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers; article quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.

Results: Thirty studies published from 1984-2010 were included; most assessed codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9th revision. Sensitivity and specificity of hospitalization data for identifying MI in most [≥50%] studies was ≥86%, and PPV in most studies was ≥93%. The PPV was higher in the more-recent studies, and lower when criteria that do not incorporate cardiac troponin levels (such as the MONICA) were employed as the gold standard. MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates also demonstrated lower accuracy, with maximum PPV of 60% (for definite MI).

Conclusions: Hospitalization data has higher validity and hence can be used to identify MI, but the accuracy of MI as a cause-of-death on death certificates is suboptimal, and more studies are needed on the validity of ICD-10 codes. When using administrative data for research purposes, authors should recognize these factors and avoid using vital statistics data if hospitalization data is not available to confirm deaths from MI.

Citing Articles

Healthcare utilization, mortality, and cardiovascular events following GLP1-RA initiation in chronic kidney disease.

Zhang S, Sidra F, Alvarez C, Kinaan M, Lingvay I, Mansi I Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10623.

PMID: 39639039 PMC: 11621321. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54009-3.


Ticagrelor vs Prasugrel for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Routine Care.

Kruger N, Krefting J, Kessler T, Schmieder R, Starnecker F, Dutsch A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(12):e2448389.

PMID: 39621344 PMC: 11612834. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.48389.


Definitions of clinical study outcome measures for cardiovascular diseases: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).

Wilkinson C, Bhatty A, Batra G, Aktaa S, Smith A, Dwight J Eur Heart J. 2024; 46(2):190-214.

PMID: 39545867 PMC: 11704390. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae724.


Risk of short-term cardiovascular disease in relation to the mode of delivery in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.

Lobitz G, Rosenfeld E, Lee R, Sagaram D, Ananth C EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 76():102851.

PMID: 39391017 PMC: 11466563. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102851.


Usefulness and caveats of real-world data for research on hypertension and its association with cardiovascular or renal disease in Japan.

Satoh M, Nakayama S, Toyama M, Hashimoto H, Murakami T, Metoki H Hypertens Res. 2024; 47(11):3099-3113.

PMID: 39261703 PMC: 11534704. DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01875-5.


References
1.
Lowel H, Lewis M, Hormann A, Keil U . Case finding, data quality aspects and comparability of myocardial infarction registers: results of a south German register study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(3):249-60. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90036-9. View

2.
Luepker R, Apple F, Christenson R, Crow R, Fortmann S, Goff D . Case definitions for acute coronary heart disease in epidemiology and clinical research studies: a statement from the AHA Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; AHA Statistics Committee; World Heart Federation Council on Epidemiology and.... Circulation. 2003; 108(20):2543-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000100560.46946.EA. View

3.
De Vera M, Rahman M, Bhole V, Kopec J, Choi H . Independent impact of gout on the risk of acute myocardial infarction among elderly women: a population-based study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010; 69(6):1162-4. PMC: 3142935. DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.122770. View

4.
Fischer L, Schlienger R, Matter C, Jick H, Meier C . Effect of rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus on the risk of first-time acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 93(2):198-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.037. View

5.
Bernatsky S, Joseph L, Pineau C, Tamblyn R, Feldman D, Clarke A . A population-based assessment of systemic lupus erythematosus incidence and prevalence--results and implications of using administrative data for epidemiological studies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46(12):1814-8. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem233. View