» Articles » PMID: 24679934

Use of Just-about-right Scales and Penalty Analysis to Determine Appropriate Concentrations of Stevia Sweeteners for Vanilla Yogurt

Overview
Journal J Dairy Sci
Date 2014 Apr 1
PMID 24679934
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the mainstream emergence of natural sweeteners such as stevia, which is available in different commercial formulations, suitability for yogurt needs to be validated. The present study aimed to determine the appropriate concentration level of 3 processed stevia sweeteners/supplements in commercial plain low-fat yogurt flavored with natural vanilla. Three different levels of sucrose, aspartame, an erythritol and 95% rebaudiana A stevia sweetener, a 95% pure mix of maltodextrin and steviol glycosides, and a cold water stevia extract were used in the study. The just-about-right level for each sweetener and consumer acceptability of each naturally flavored low-fat vanilla yogurt were evaluated. Results from penalty analysis demonstrated that only 0.7% of stevia containing maltodextrin and 95% steviol glycoside was necessary, whereas higher levels (between 4.0 to 5.5%) were more appropriate for stevia containing erythritol and 95% rebaudiana A or cold water extract of stevia, respectively. The concentrations of stevia sweeteners used influenced the perceived sweetness and sourness. In general, consumers disliked the yogurt sweetened with stevia or aspartame, and neither disliked nor liked the yogurt sweetened with sucrose, which was largely driven by perceived sourness of the base yogurt. The findings underline the importance of careful selection of stevia type and concentration as well as optimizing yogurt cultures and fermentation conditions before product launch.

Citing Articles

A flavoromics approach to investigate the effect of Saskatoon berry powder on the sensory attributes, acceptability, volatile components, and electronic nose responses of a low-fat frozen yogurt.

Ryland D, Thoroski J, Shariati-Ievari S, McElrea A, Goertzen A, Dowling G Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1488413.

PMID: 39713784 PMC: 11659779. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1488413.


Developing an Acceptable Nixtamalised Maize Product for South African Consumers: Sensory, Survey and Nutrient Analysis.

Colbert T, Bothma C, Pretorius W, du Toit A Foods. 2024; 13(18).

PMID: 39335825 PMC: 11431607. DOI: 10.3390/foods13182896.


Unveiling innovation in aroma attribute evaluation of Niulanshan Baijiu: An advanced exploration of two different processing methods via food sensory omics and penalty analysis.

Wang Z, Hao W, Wei J, Huang M, Zeng X, Wang Y Food Chem X. 2023; 19:100852.

PMID: 37780286 PMC: 10534244. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100852.


Sensory Interactions between Sweetness and Fat in a Chocolate Milk Beverage.

Pedersen L, Bertelsen A, Byrne D, Kidmose U Foods. 2023; 12(14).

PMID: 37509802 PMC: 10379176. DOI: 10.3390/foods12142711.


Understanding Young Taiwanese Consumers' Acceptance, Sensory Profile, and Drivers of Liking for GABA Oolong Tea Beverages with Cold Infusions.

Wu M, Liou B, Chen Y, Lee S, Xie J, Jaw Y Foods. 2022; 11(19).

PMID: 36230065 PMC: 9562905. DOI: 10.3390/foods11192989.