» Articles » PMID: 24679710

Dynamic Stability of Individuals with Transtibial Amputation Walking in Destabilizing Environments

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2014 Apr 1
PMID 24679710
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lower limb amputation substantially disrupts motor and proprioceptive function. People with lower limb amputation experience considerable impairments in walking ability, including increased fall risk. Understanding the biomechanical aspects of the gait of these patients is crucial in improving their gait function and their quality of life. In the present study, 9 persons with unilateral transtibial amputation and 13 able-bodied controls walked on a large treadmill in a Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN). While walking, subjects were either not perturbed, or were perturbed either by continuous mediolateral platform movements or by continuous mediolateral movements of the visual scene. Means and standard deviations of both step lengths and step widths increased significantly during both perturbation conditions (all p<0.001) for both groups. Measures of variability, local and orbital dynamic stability of trunk movements likewise exhibited large and highly significant increases during both perturbation conditions (all p<0.001) for both groups. Patients with amputation exhibited greater step width variability (p=0.01) and greater trunk movement variability (p=0.04) during platform perturbations, but did not exhibit greater local or orbital instability than healthy controls for either perturbation conditions. Our findings suggest that, in the absence of other co-morbidities, patients with unilateral transtibial amputation appear to retain sufficient sensory and motor function to maintain overall upper body stability during walking, even when substantially challenged. Additionally, these patients did not appear to rely more heavily on visual feedback to maintain trunk stability during these walking tasks.

Citing Articles

[Agonist-antagonist myoneural interface (AMI) : Innovative treatment option for lower limb amputees?].

Kalff M, Hoursch V, Kirsten N, Pardo Jr L, Kasprzak K, Egger M Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2025; .

PMID: 40050449 DOI: 10.1007/s00113-025-01536-3.


Development of a multidimensional military readiness assessment.

Sheehan R, Vernon M Front Rehabil Sci. 2024; 5:1345505.

PMID: 38572296 PMC: 10987742. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1345505.


Agonist-antagonist muscle strain in the residual limb preserves motor control and perception after amputation.

Song H, Israel E, Gutierrez-Arango S, Teng A, Srinivasan S, Freed L Commun Med (Lond). 2022; 2:97.

PMID: 35942078 PMC: 9356003. DOI: 10.1038/s43856-022-00162-z.


Dynamic balancing responses in unilateral transtibial amputees following outward-directed perturbations during slow treadmill walking differ considerably for amputated and non-amputated side.

Olensek A, Zadravec M, Burger H, Matjacic Z J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021; 18(1):123.

PMID: 34332595 PMC: 8325816. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00914-3.


The effects of ground-irregularity-cancelling prosthesis control on balance over uneven surfaces.

Chiu V, Voloshina A, Collins S R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(1):201235.

PMID: 33614071 PMC: 7890502. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201235.


References
1.
Timmer J, Haussler S, Lauk M, Lucking C . Pathological tremors: Deterministic chaos or nonlinear stochastic oscillators?. Chaos. 2003; 10(1):278-288. DOI: 10.1063/1.166494. View

2.
Fernie G, Holden J, Soto M . Biofeedback training of knee control in the above-knee amputee. Am J Phys Med. 1978; 57(4):161-6. View

3.
Vaughan C, OMalley M . Froude and the contribution of naval architecture to our understanding of bipedal locomotion. Gait Posture. 2005; 21(3):350-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.011. View

4.
Dingwell J, Cusumano J . Nonlinear time series analysis of normal and pathological human walking. Chaos. 2003; 10(4):848-863. DOI: 10.1063/1.1324008. View

5.
McAndrew Young P, Dingwell J . Voluntarily changing step length or step width affects dynamic stability of human walking. Gait Posture. 2011; 35(3):472-7. PMC: 3299923. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.010. View