» Articles » PMID: 24673973

Pan-European Early Switch/early Discharge Opportunities Exist for Hospitalized Patients with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2014 Mar 29
PMID 24673973
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to document pan-European real-world treatment patterns and healthcare resource use and estimate opportunities for early switch (ES) from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics and early discharge (ED) in hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs). This retrospective observational medical chart review study enrolled 342 physicians across 12 European countries who collected data from 1542 patients with documented MRSA cSSTI who were hospitalized (July 2010 to June 2011) and discharged alive (by July 2011). Data included clinical characteristics and outcomes, hospital length of stay (LOS), MRSA-targeted IV and oral antibiotic use, and ES and ED eligibility according to literature-based and expert-validated criteria. The most frequent initial MRSA-active antibiotics were vancomycin (50.2%), linezolid (15.1%), clindamycin (10.8%), and teicoplanin (10.4%). Patients discharged with MRSA-active antibiotics (n = 480) were most frequently prescribed linezolid (42.1%) and clindamycin (19.8%). IV treatment duration (9.3 ± 6.5 vs. 14.6 ± 9.9 days; p <0.001) and hospital LOS (19.1 ± 12.9 vs. 21.0 ± 18.2 days; p 0.162) tended to be shorter for patients switched from IV to oral treatment than for patients who received IV treatment only. Of the patients, 33.6% met ES criteria and could have discontinued IV treatment 6.0 ± 5.5 days earlier, and 37.9% met ED criteria and could have been discharged 6.2 ± 8.2 days earlier. More than one-third of European patients hospitalized for MRSA cSSTI could be eligible for ES and ED, resulting in substantial reductions in IV days and bed-days, with potential savings of €2000 per ED-eligible patient.

Citing Articles

Real-world effectiveness of omadacycline and impact of unapproved omadacycline prescription claims among adult outpatients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia or acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.

Lodise T, Gunter K, Mu F, Gao E, Yang D, Yim E J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023; 29(8):952-964.

PMID: 37307087 PMC: 10398854. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22454.


Oral minocycline plus rifampicin versus oral linezolid for complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by methicillin-resistant : The AIDA open label, randomized, controlled Phase 4 trial.

Kotsaki A, Tziolos N, Kontopoulou T, Koutelidakis I, Symbardi S, Reed V EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 56:101790.

PMID: 36618892 PMC: 9813692. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101790.


Point prevalence study of antibiotic appropriateness and possibility of early discharge from hospital among patients treated with antibiotics in a Swiss University Hospital.

Moulin E, Boillat-Blanco N, Zanetti G, Pluss-Suard C, De Valliere S, Senn L Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022; 11(1):66.

PMID: 35526066 PMC: 9080203. DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01104-z.


Discharge Home After Transition to Oral Antibiotics: No Jeopardy.

Snow J, McCulloh R Hosp Pediatr. 2020; 10(11):e11-e13.

PMID: 33028598 PMC: 7596728. DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000752.


The Real-World Economic and Clinical Management of Adult Patients with Skin and Soft Tissue Infections (SSTIs) with Oritavancin: Data from Two Multicenter Observational Cohort Studies.

Estrada S, Lodise T, Tillotson G, Delaportas D Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020; 7(Suppl 1):6-12.

PMID: 32588389 PMC: 7334314. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-020-00199-3.