» Articles » PMID: 24673792

Efficacy and Resistance in De Novo Combination Lamivudine and Adefovir Dipivoxil Therapy Versus Entecavir Monotherapy for the Treatment-naive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Virol J
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2014 Mar 29
PMID 24673792
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Currently, there is no consensus on the efficacy and resistance of de novo combination therapy versus monotherapy for treatment naive patients of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and resistance of de novo combination of lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) compared with entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with CHB.

Study Design: Publications on the effectiveness and resistance of LAM plus ADV versus ETV monotherapy for nucleos(t)ide-naive patients with CHB were identified by a search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of science, OVID, and CBM (Chinese Biological Medical Literature) until May 1, 2013. Biochemical response, hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, and viroligic response were extracted and combined to obtain an integrated result. Viral resistance and safety were reviewed.

Results: Five eligible studies (328 patients in total) were included in the analysis. LAM plus ADV combination therapy produced more rapid HBV DNA reduction rate at 12 weeks than that of ETV monotherapy. At 48 weeks, the combination group had superior viroligic response rates compared with ETV group (90.0% vs. 78.9%, P=0.01). The difference in the ALT normalization and HBeAg seroconversion rates was not found. At week 96, LAM + ADV was more effective than ETV in ALT normalization [RR = 1. 11, 95% CI (1.02, 1.21), P =0.01] and HBeAg seroconversion [RR = 2.00, 95% CI (1.26, 3.18, P=0.003)], and no significant difference was found in the virologic response (P =0.23). No viral resistance occurred in combination therapy and six patients in ETV group were experienced with viral breakthrough. Both groups were well tolerated.

Conclusion: The de novo LAM plus ADV combination therapy for treatment-naïve patients with CHB was greater than ETV monotherapy in both biochemical response and HBeAg seroconversion rate up to 96 weeks. The rate of emergence of viral resistance in the combination group was less than that in the ETV monotherapy.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of nucleos(t)ide analogues(NAs) in preventing virus reactivation in oncology patients with HBV infection after chemotherapy or surgery: A network meta-analysis.

Zhao Y, Song Y, Zhang H, Qu T, Axinbai M, Yang Y Front Oncol. 2023; 12:1050714.

PMID: 36727050 PMC: 9885183. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1050714.


Comparing the efficacy and safety of tenofovir and adefovir or combined drug treatment for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bi Z, Wang L, Hou H, Lu M, Wang W, Li Z Ann Transl Med. 2022; 10(18):1016.

PMID: 36267714 PMC: 9577806. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3747.


Genotypic Resistance Remains A Concern In Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With High Viral Load After Lamivudine And Adefovir Combination Therapy.

Huang M, Zhong J, Lu C, Deng F, Li L, Nong Y Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2019; 12:297-303.

PMID: 31695474 PMC: 6814354. DOI: 10.2147/PGPM.S224256.


An interferon-like small chemical compound CDM-3008 suppresses hepatitis B virus through induction of interferon-stimulated genes.

Furutani Y, Toguchi M, Shiozaki-Sato Y, Qin X, Ebisui E, Higuchi S PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0216139.

PMID: 31188831 PMC: 6561549. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216139.


Entecavir monotherapy versus de novo combination of lamivudine and adefovir for compensated hepatitis B virus-related cirrhosis: a real-world prospective multicenter cohort study.

Wu X, Zhou J, Xie W, Ding H, Ou X, Chen G Infect Drug Resist. 2019; 12:745-757.

PMID: 31015765 PMC: 6448536. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S185120.


References
1.
Yao G, Zhu M, Cui Z, Wang B, Yao J, Zeng M . A 7-year study of lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B virus e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B patients in China. J Dig Dis. 2009; 10(2):131-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2009.00375.x. View

2.
Nagasaki F, Niitsuma H, Ueno Y, Inoue J, Kogure T, Fukushima K . The high incidence of the emergence of entecavir-resistant mutants among patients infected with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2007; 213(2):181-6. DOI: 10.1620/tjem.213.181. View

3.
Heo N, Lim Y, Lee H, Chung Y, Lee Y, Suh D . Lamivudine plus adefovir or entecavir for patients with chronic hepatitis B resistant to lamivudine and adefovir. J Hepatol. 2010; 53(3):449-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.03.020. View

4.
Fung J, Lai C, Seto W, Yuen M . Nucleoside/nucleotide analogues in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66(12):2715-25. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkr388. View

5.
Neumann-Fraune M, Beggel B, Pfister H, Kaiser R, Verheyen J . High frequency of complex mutational patterns in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B virus isolates. J Med Virol. 2013; 85(5):775-9. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23530. View